Rakosi v. Daniel Perla Associates, L.P.
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
| Citation | Rakosi v. Daniel Perla Associates, L.P., 3 A.D.3d 431, 772 N.Y.S.2d 648, 2004 NY Slip Op 331 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004) |
| Decision Date | 22 January 2004 |
| Docket Number | 2727 |
| Parties | MICHAEL RAKOSI, Appellant, v. DANIEL PERLA ASSOCIATES, L.P., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants. |
The action was properly dismissed as against defendants-respondents on the ground that it constitutes a collateral attack upon a prior judgment of foreclosure and sale. Although the evidence demonstrates that plaintiff was named and served in the foreclosure action, he defaulted and, rather than moving in that action under CPLR...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
3 cases
-
Burkwit v. Olson
...on the order and thus is not properly before us ( seeSiegel, N.Y. Prac. § 8, at 11 n. 4 [4th ed.]; see generally Rakosi v. Perla Assoc., 3 A.D.3d 431, 431–432, 772 N.Y.S.2d 648).Election Law § 16–102(2) sets forth the procedure for commencing “[a] proceeding with respect to a ... caucus.” H......
-
Lajaunie v. Samuels & Son Seafood Co.
...during the course of a legal proceeding must be exercised in that lawsuit by moving to vacate the civil judgment"); Rakosi v. Perla Assoc., 3 A.D. 3d 431 (1st Dept 2004) (movantcannot bring a new action as a collateral attack upon a prior judgment as remedy is to move to vacate the judgment......
- In the Matter of Dov Bronner v. Division of Housing and Community Renewal