Raleigh Wake Citizens Ass'n v. Wake Cnty. Bd. of Elections

Docket Number16-1270,16-1271
Decision Date01 July 2016

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
30 cases
  • Moore v. Circosta, 1:20CV911
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of North Carolina
    • October 14, 2020
    ...one vote principle," and resulted in one group or community's vote counting more than another's. Raleigh Wake Citizens Ass'n v. Wake Cnty. Bd. of Elections, 827 F.3d 333, 340 (4th Cir. 2016) ; see also Gill v. Whitford, 585 U.S. ––––, ––––, 138 S. Ct. 1916, 1930-31, 201 L.Ed.2d 313 (2018) (......
  • Holloway v. City of Virginia Beach
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • July 27, 2022
    ...of the VRA." Holloway , 531 F. Supp. 3d at 1053. We review such legal determinations de novo. Raleigh Wake Citizens Ass'n v. Wake Cnty. Bd. of Elections , 827 F.3d 333, 340 (4th Cir. 2016).Section 2(a) of the VRA prohibits any voting standard or practice that "results in a denial or abridgm......
  • Cause v. Rucho
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of North Carolina
    • January 9, 2018
    ...empirical methods to redistricting, to date, has largely occurred in academic research. But see Raleigh Wake Citizens Ass'n v. Wake Cty. Bd. of Elections , 827 F.3d 333, 344 (4th Cir. 2016) (relying on analysis of hundreds of computer-simulated districting plans as evidence that population ......
  • N.C. State Conference of the NAACP v. McCrory
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • July 29, 2016
    ...1564 —as this same General Assembly was found to have done earlier this year. SeeRaleigh Wake Citizens Ass'n v. Wake Cty. Bd. of Elections, No. 16–1270, 827 F.3d 333, 2016 WL 3568147 (4th Cir. July 1, 2016).7 Some of the statements by those supporting the legislation included a Republican p......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • GERRYMANDERING AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL NORM AGAINST GOVERNMENT PARTISANSHIP.
    • United States
    • Michigan Law Review Vol. 116 No. 3, December 2017
    • December 1, 2017
    ...(28.) Raleigh Wake Citizens Ass'n v. Wake Cty. Bd. of Elections, 166 F. Supp. 3d 553 (E.D. N.C.), ajfd in part, rev'd in part, 827 F.3d 333 (4th Cir. 2016). (29.) League of Women Voters v. Commonwealth, No. 261-MD-2017 (Pa. Commw. Ct. filed June 15, (30.) 137 S. Ct. 2268 (2017) (mem.) (sett......
  • The Race-Blind Future of Voting Rights.
    • United States
    • Yale Law Journal Vol. 130 No. 4, February 2021
    • February 1, 2021
    ...when enacted plans differ significantly from most simulated maps. See, e.g., Raleigh Wake Citizens Ass'n v. Wake Cty. Bd. of Elections, 827 F.3d 333, 344 (4th Cir. 2016) (holding that certain districts were improperly drawn based on Chen's conclusion "that the [population] deviations at iss......