Ramirez v. State
| Docket Number | 45S05-1305-CR-331 |
| Decision Date | 29 April 2014 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Start Your 7-day Trial
32 cases
-
State v. Berrios
...103–104, 334 Ill.Dec. 865, 917 N.E.2d 940 (2009), cert. denied, 559 U.S. 1108, 130 S.Ct. 2402, 176 L.Ed.2d 925 (2010) ; Ramirez v. State, 7 N.E.3d 933, 936–38 (Ind.2014) ; Jenkins v. State, 375 Md. 284, 317–19, 825 A.2d 1008 (2003) ; Meyer v. State, 119 Nev. 554, 564–65, 80 P.3d 447 (2003) ......
-
State v. Berrios
...234 Ill. 2d 68, 103-104, 917 N.E.2d 940 (2009), cert. denied, 559 U.S. 1108, 130 S. Ct. 2402, 176 L. Ed. 2d 925 (2010); Ramirez v. State, 7 N.E.3d 933, 936-38 (Ind. 2014); Jenkins v. State, 375 Md. 284, 317-19, 825 A.2d 1008 (2003); Meyer v. State, 119 Nev. 554, 564-65, 80 P.3d 447 (2003); ......
-
Conley v. State
...mistrial is warranted because it can assess firsthand all relevant facts and circumstances and their impact on the jury. Ramirez v. State, 7 N.E.3d 933, 935 (Ind.2014) (citing Kelley v. State, 555 N.E.2d 140, 141 (Ind.1990) ). We therefore review denial of a motion for mistrial only for an ......
-
Weisheit v. State
...at issue and their impact on the jury, it is in the best position to evaluate whether a mistrial is warranted. Ramirez v. State, 7 N.E.3d 933, 935 (Ind.2014). We accordingly review the trial court's denial of a motion for a mistrial for an abuse of discretion. Id. (citing Gregory v. State, ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
ICEBERG AHEAD: WHY COURTS SHOULD PRESUME BIAS IN CASES OF EXTRANEOUS JUROR CONTACTS.
...("Defendants seeking a mistrial for suspected jury taint are entitled to the presumption of prejudice...." (quoting Ramirez v. State, 7 N.E.3d 933, 939 (Ind. 2014))). (283.) State v. Christensen, 929 N.W.2d 646, 678 (Iowa 2019) ("[T]he Remmertype presumption is for 'more than innocuous inte......