Ramm v. Ramm

Decision Date12 May 1971
Citation271 N.E.2d 558,28 N.Y.2d 892,322 N.Y.S.2d 726
Parties, 271 N.E.2d 558 Elsa T. RAMM, Appellant, v. August H. RAMM, et al., Respondents.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, 34 A.D.2d 667, 310 N.Y.S.2d 111.

Austin & DuPont, Mineola (Paul C. Ludwig, Jr., Stephen J. Masse, Mineola, of counsel), for appellant.

David Miller Kahn, White Plains (Martin J. Rosen, White Plains, of counsel), for defendants-respondents.

A declaratory judgment was brought for the determination of the validity of a Mexican divorce. The Supreme Court, Queens County, entered a judgment upholding validity of divorce and the plaintiff appealed.

The Appellate Division modified the judgment, and as modified, affirmed. It held that the wife's appearance, entered after rendition of final judgment of divorce that was void and nonrecognizable in New York when rendered, which resulted in a post judgment declaration by Mexican court that judgment was res judicata and invulnerable to attack by parties or stranger to action, qualified divorce for recognition in New York as of date of appearance. The plaintiff appealed.

On appeal the plaintiff wife argued that the subsequent proceedings in Mexico were ineffective to qualify divorce for recognition as a valid judgment, that the second Mexican decision was entered upon the unauthorized appearance of the plaintiff and that the notice...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Feinberg v. Feinberg
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 23 juni 1975
    ...offer proof (cf. Rawitz v. Rawitz, 31 A.D.2d 832, 297 N.Y.S.2d 973; Ramm v. Ramm, 34 A.D.2d 667, 310 N.Y.S.2d 111, affd. 28 N.Y.2d 892, 322 N.Y.S.2d 726, 271 N.E.2d 558). Beyond this question, there exists a triable issue of fact concerning the nature of the inducement which appellant claim......
  • Belt v. Belt
    • United States
    • New York Family Court
    • 31 augustus 1971
    ...from attacking the divorce decree in the rendering jurisdiction (Ramm v. Ramm, 34 A.D.2d 667, 310 N.Y.S.2d 111, aff'd 28 N.Y.2d 892, 322 N.Y.S.2d 726, 271 N.E.2d 558). The Appellate Court in the Ramm case pointed out that (p. 669, 310 N.Y.S.2d p. 114): 'Mexican law does not recognize a Nunc......
  • Dorfman v. Texaco, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 12 mei 1971
  • Matter of Rodriguez
    • United States
    • U.S. DOJ Board of Immigration Appeals
    • 21 maart 1975
    ...was entitled to recognition in New York. See also Ramm v. Ramm, 34 App.Div.2d 667, 310 N.Y.S.2d 111 (1970), aff'd, 28 N.Y.2d 892, 271 N.E.2d 558, 322 N.Y.S.2d 726 (1971). A Dominican Republic divorce decree allegedly dissolving the marriage of two Dominican citizens who were married in the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT