Ramos v. Louisiana
| Docket Number | 18-5924 |
| Decision Date | 20 April 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
1652 cases
-
City of San Jose v. Trump, No. 20-CV-05167-RRC-LHK-EMC
...this framework.The drafting history of a constitutional provision can inform its meaning. See, e.g. , Ramos v. Louisiana , ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S. Ct. 1390, 1400, 206 L.Ed.2d 583 (2020) (addressing Louisiana's argument about the drafting history of the Sixth Amendment); see also Comptroller o......
-
Said v. United States
...instructions also runs afoul of the long-established right of jury unanimity enshrined in the Sixth Amendment. See Ramos v. Louisiana, 140 S. Ct. 1390, at 1391 (2020) (holding that the "Constitution's text and structure clearly indicate that the Sixth Amendment term "trial by an impartial j......
-
People v. Wilson
...in this case.17 In his notice of new authority, Wilson also cites the Supreme Court's recent decision in Ramos v. Louisiana (2020) ––– U.S. ––––, [140 S.Ct. 1390, 206 L.Ed.2d 583], which held that the Sixth Amendment's unanimity requirement applies to criminal trials in state courts. Given ......
-
United States v. Manubolu, 1:19-cr-00184-JAW
...(1st Cir. 1985) (Federal Rules of Evidence apply in federal criminal proceedings); Ramos v. Louisiana , ––– U.S. ––––, 140 S. Ct. 1390, 1416 n.5, 206 L.Ed.2d 583 (2020) (Kavanaugh, J., concurring in part); Rodriguez de Quijas v. Shearson/Am. Express, Inc. , 490 U. S. 477, 484, 109 S.Ct. 191......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Warning You Of Your Right To Remain Silent Is Not A Right After All
...at fn. 5. 16. Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC, 576 U.S. 446, 455 (2015) (quotation omitted). 17. Ramos v. Louisiana, ___ U.S. ___, 140 S. Ct. 1390, 1411 (2020) (quotation 18. Dickerson, 530 U.S. at 443. 19. Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, ___ U.S. ___ 2022), 2022 U.S. LEXI......
65 books & journal articles
-
Reviving Teague's "Watershed" Exception.
...none of the primacy and centrality of the rule adopted in Gideon or other rules which may be thought to be within the exception"). (13.) 140 S. Ct. 1390 (14.) 489 U.S. at 312 (plurality opinion) (quoting Desist v. United States, 394 U.S. 244, 262 (1969) (Harlan, J., dissenting)). (15.) Id. ......
-
MISSING THE MISJOINDER MARK: IMPROVING CRIMINAL JOINDER OF OFFENSES IN CAPITAL-SENTENCING JURISDICTIONS.
...See CRIM. PROC. art. 493.2. (170) Id. Following Ramos v. Louisiana, the provision is likely unconstitutional. See Ramos v. Louisiana, 140 S.Ct. 1390, 1397 (2020). (171) Make no mistake, in most historical criminal contexts, Louisiana has rightfully been called out by the public and federal ......
-
Trial issues
...of the Fourteenth Amendment—requires a unanimous verdict to convict a defendant of a serious offense. Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. ___, 140 S.Ct. 1390, 206 L.Ed.2d 583 (2020). Ramos announced a new rule of criminal procedure. It does not apply retroactively on federal collateral review. Edw......
-
THE LEGALITY OF PRESIDENTIAL SELF-PARDONS.
...448 U.S. 297 (1980) (refusing to create a constitutional right to public funding of abortions). (192.) See, e.g., Ramos v. Louisiana, 140 S. Ct. 1390 (2020) (ruling that a jury verdict in a "serious" criminal case (where there is the potential of more than six-months confinement) must be un......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 provisions
-
Pennsylvania Bulletin, Vol 52, No. 19. May 7, 2022
...understanding that he or she has the right to a unanimous verdict, Commonwealth v. Jackson, 324 A.2d 350 (Pa. 1974); Ramos v. Louisiana, 140 S.Ct. 1390 (2020), and, if charged with any offense punishable by a maximum period of incarceration ing six months, the right to a trial by a jury, Co......