Ramsey v. Physicians Memorial Hospital, Inc.

Decision Date12 May 1977
Docket NumberNo. 559,559
Citation36 Md.App. 42,373 A.2d 26
PartiesJohn RAMSEY, Jr. et al., v. PHYSICIANS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC. et al.
CourtCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland

Henry E. Weil, Bethesda, with whom were Belli, Weil & Jacobs, Bethesda, on the brief, for appellants.

M. Wayne Munday, La Plata, with whom were James C. Tucker and Mudd, Mudd, Munday & Heinze, La Plata, on the brief, for appellees.

Argued before MORTON, MENCHINE and MASON, JJ.

MORTON, Judge.

Appellants, parents of infant children Ernest Lee Ramsey (deceased) and Kenneth W. Ramsey, brought suit in the Circuit Court for Prince George's County against Physician's Memorial Hospital, Inc., A. Del La.Paz, M.D., S. Azer, M.D., and Om P. Chhabra, M.D., charging that although the defendants had held themselves out to be qualified and competent to render medical treatment, they negligently failed to diagnose the disease of Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever which the infant children were suffering and from which disease Ernest Lee Ramsey, age one year, died and Kenneth W. Ramsey, age two years, became seriously ill. The case was subsequently removed to the Circuit Court for Calvert County where it was tried before a jury (Bowen, J., presiding).

At the close of the presentation of evidence, the court reserved defendants' motions for directed verdicts in accordance with Maryland Rule 552(c) and allowed the case to go to the jury. The jury returned a verdict for appellants against Physician's Memorial Hospital, Inc., and Dr. Azer, appellees herein, and in favor of Dr. Del LaPaz and Dr. Chhabra. Damages were assessed at $75,280 for Ernest and $5,000 for Kenneth. Thereafter, pursuant to Maryland Rule 563(a)(2), the court entered judgments n. o. v. in favor of the hospital and Dr. Azer.

The single issue on appeal is whether the trial judge erred in entering the judgments. The verdicts rendered in favor of Dr. Del LaPaz and Dr. Chhabra are not challenged.

According to the evidence, the Ramseys lived in a rural area of Charles County known as Gallant Green. In early May, 1974, Mrs. Ramsey removed two ticks from her son Kenneth. Several days later she noticed a rash on both Ernest and Kenneth. The rash started on the chest and head and was accompanied by a high fever. This prompted Mr. and Mrs. Ramsey to take their two boys to the emergency room at Physician's Memorial Hospital. While there, Mrs. Ramsey told the nurse on duty that she had removed two ticks from Kenneth, one from his head and one from his stomach. This testimony was confirmed by Mr. Ramsey and not contradicted by other witnesses. According to the attending physician, Dr. Del LaPaz, he asked the parents about ticks and was told nothing. He also ordered a search for ticks which proved fruitless. The nurse did not tell Dr. Del LaPaz of the tick history which Mrs. Ramsey had related to her.

In diagnosing their condition, Dr. Del LaPaz decided the children were suffering from measles and prescribed that the boys take aspirin and be kept in a darkened room. Two days later the rash had spread to the arms and legs of the two boys and the fever had not subsided. On that day, May 14, 1974, the Ramseys returned to the emergency room at Physician's Memorial Hospital where the children were examined by Dr. Azer.

Dr. Azer, not a pediatrician himself, was unsure of his tentative diagnosis of measles and consulted with the Ramsey's pediatrician, Dr. Chhabra. Thereafter, Dr. Azer instructed the Ramseys to see Dr. Chhabra and not to come back to the emergency room as there was nothing else that could be done there. Dr. Chhabra examined the boys the following day while they were still suffering from a generalized rash and high fever. Again measles was tentatively diagnosed. Dr. Chhabra advised that the boys be kept in a dark room and that he be notified of any change.

Four days later the children's condition had greatly worsened, but the Ramseys were unable to reach Dr. Chhabra. On the following day Ernest was found dead. Kenneth was taken to Cafritz where two ticks were removed from him. He was subsequently treated and cured of Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever. The only injury he sustained was a limp which was gone within six months. The autopsy performed on Ernest showed that he died of Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever.

In a definitive opinion refashioning the standards of care by which the conduct of a physician or a hospital is to be appraised in medical malpractice cases, Judge Irving A. Levine announced for the Court of Appeals in Shilkret v. Annapolis Emergency Hosp., 276 Md. 187, 349 A.2d 245 (1975):

'(A) physician is under a duty to use that degree of care and skill which is expected of a reasonably competent practitioner in the same class to which he belongs, acting in the same or similar circumstances. Under this standard, advances in the profession, availability of facilities, specialization or general practice, proximity of specialists and special facilities, together with all other relevant considerations, are to be taken into account.' Id. at 200-01, 349 A.2d at 253.

'(A) hospital is required to use that degree of care and skill which is expected of a reasonably competent hospital in the same or similar circumstances. As in cases brought against physicians, advances in the profession, availability of special facilities and specialists, together with all other relevant considerations, are to be taken into account.' Id. at 202, 349 A.2d at 254.

I. Dr. Azer

According to the medical evidence Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever is a relatively rare disease caused by the bite of an infected tick. In 1970 there were 270 cases in the United States of which approximately ten percent occurred in Maryland. It is a difficult disease to detect since there are several differential diagnoses which must be considered because certain symptoms are common to a number of various diseases. These differential diagnoses usually include Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, measles, endemic typhus, meningococcemia, typhoid fever, early smallpox and certain intra viral infections with rash.

In the case of the Ramsey boys, the diagnosis, according to the testimony, was particularly difficult. None of the doctors had any knowledge of the tick history given to the nurse in the emergency room on May 12, 1974. The rash began as it would in measles, on the head and chest, spreading peripherally toward the extremities; whereas, the rash typical of Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever ordinarily begins on the hands and feet and spreads toward the center of the body. The rash was reddish in color and could only be distinguished from measles when it turned purple. The high fever is characteristic of both measles and Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever. To complicate the diagnoses further, neither boy had been vaccinated against measles. Since measles is a contagious disease, it would be common to find two brothers exhibiting symptoms of measles at the same time. Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, on the other hand, is not contagious and simultaneous infection is very unusual. These factors led each of the three doctors who saw Ernest and Kenneth to diagnose the illness as measles or something related thereto. Appellants argue that once several diagnoses were considered, it was a violation of the acceptable standard of medical practice not to have hospitalized the children for observation and, assuming further manifestation of Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, eventually treatment.

Appellants endeavored to establish this standard through the following testimony of their expert witness, Dr. Walter E. Goozh, M.D.:

'JUDGE BOWEN: Why don't you ask it this way. You are a pediatrician, you are practicing in Charles County. Two people are brought to you of the ages of these children, one of which you have received a call from the hospital about before. They displayed the fever as described in the question, 104 or 105 degrees rectally. They had a generalized rash consistent with a measles rash. There is no history of any rash commenced on their hands or feet or at their wrists. There...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Am. Radiology Servs., LLC v. Reiss
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • 24 Agosto 2020
    ...that a question about what expert himself would have done "did not go to the standard of the profession"); Ramsey v. Physicians Mem'l Hosp ., 36 Md. App. [ ] 42, 49 (1977) (holding that an expert's statement about what he or she personally would have done in treating the patient is not evid......
  • Reiss v. Am. Radiology Servs., LLC
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • 26 Junio 2019
    ...within the field of his [or her] expertise, the opinion may be excluded from evidence"); see also Ramsey v. Physicians Mem'l Hosp. , 36 Md. App. 42, 49, 373 A.2d 26 (1977) (holding that plaintiffs did not generate triable issue of medical negligence because expert would not express a "defin......
  • Gallagher v. Pierhomes
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • 1 Octubre 2008
    ...See also Mahler v. Johns Hopkins Hospital, Inc., 170 Md.App. 293, 317-18, 907 A.2d 276 (2006); Ramsey v. Physician's Memorial Hospital, Inc., 36 Md.App. 42, 48-49, 373 A.2d 26 (1977). Because the evidence before the circuit court was legally insufficient to support the imposition of strict ......
  • Suburban Hospital, Inc. v. Kirson
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • 27 Octubre 1999
    ...right to recover, the case should be submitted to the jury, and a motion for judgment n.o.v. denied. Ramsey v. Physicians Memorial Hosp., Inc., 36 Md.App. 42, 48, 373 A.2d 26 (1977) (internal quotations omitted) (quoting Miller v. Michalek, 13 Md.App. 16, 17-18, 281 A.2d 117 (1971)); Housto......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Biased but Reasonable: Bias Under the Cover of Standard of Care
    • United States
    • University of Georgia School of Law Georgia Law Review (FC Access) No. 57-2, 2023
    • Invalid date
    ...medical judgment and render minimally competent care in the course of services he provides."); Ramsey v. Physicians Mem'l Hosp., Inc., 373 A.2d 26, 29 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1977) (explaining that the physician-defendant did not violate "the minimum standard of care . . . 'expected of a reason......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT