Randolph v. Willis
Decision Date | 28 June 1963 |
Docket Number | Civ. No. 63-743. |
Citation | 220 F. Supp. 355 |
Parties | Robert E. RANDOLPH, John Allen Johnson, Frances E. Johnson, George Waegell, Plaintiffs, v. Edwin W. WILLIS, August E. Johansen, William M. Tuck, Alfred M. Nittle, Francis J. McNamara, William Wheeler, Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of California |
A. L. Wirin, Fred Okrand, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs.
Francis E. Whalen, U. S. Atty., Donald A. Fareed, Clarke A. Knicely, Asst. U. S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants.
Thus cause having come before the Court for hearing upon plaintiffs' motion "for stay and/or continuance of return date of subpoenas", filed June 25, 1963, and the motion having been argued and submitted for decision; and it appearing to the Court that:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
United States ex rel. Siegal v. Follette
...273 U.S. 269, 273, 47 S.Ct. 355, 71 L.Ed. 642 (1927); Rudder v. United States, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 329, 226 F.2d 51 (1955); Randolph v. Willis, 220 F.Supp. 355 (S.D.Cal.1963). 20 Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 469, 58 S.Ct. 1019, 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1937); United States ex rel. Weiss v. Fay, 232 F......
-
Application of Johnson
...786, 787-788 (D.Minn.1955). Thus, "no equitable remedy whereby to forestall the fait accompli" can be devised. Randolph v. Willis, 220 F.Supp. 355, 359 (S.D. Cal. 1963). Second, appellants rely heavily on In Application of United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America, 111 F.Supp.......
-
United States ex rel. Keating v. Bensinger, 71 C 307.
...(1927); Rudder v. United States, 96 U.S. App.D.C. 329, 226 F.2d 51 (1955); United States ex rel. Siegal, supra n. 3; Randolph v. Willis, 220 F.Supp. 355 (S.D. Cal.1963). 7 In re Shuttlesworth, supra n. 2; Brown v. Fogel, 387 F.2d 692 (4th Cir. 1967); Dameron, supra n. 4; Mastrian, supra n. ......
-
Grady v. Iowa State Penitentiary
... ... Kentucky, 273 U.S. 269, 273, 47 S.Ct. 353, 71 L.Ed. 639 (1927); Rudder v. United States, 96 U.S.App.D. C. 329, 226 F.2d 51 (1955); Randolph v. Willis, 220 F.Supp. 355 (S.D.Cal.1963). The due process guarantee in this instance, however, prohibits only such things as the denial of ... ...