Rankin v. Malarkey
Decision Date | 22 March 1893 |
Citation | 23 Or. 593,32 P. 620 |
Parties | RANKIN v. MALARKEY et al. |
Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Appeal from circuit court, Multnomah county; L.B. Stearns, Judge.
Action by N.K. Rankin against Charles A. Malarkey and others to foreclose a mechanic's lien. From a judgment in plaintiff's favor, defendants appeal. Reversed.
Chas. H. Carey and Dan'l. J. Malarkey, for appellant.
C.M Idleman and Durham & Platt, for respondent.
This is a suit to foreclose a lien upon lots 3 and 4 in block 7 of King's second addition to the city of Portland, Or., and upon a dwelling houuse erected thereon, the property of C.A Malarkey, one of the appellants herein, for material furnished to the contractor. The court below held the lien valid, and a decree was entered foreclosing it, from which the defendants appeal.
Appellants contend that the notice set out in the pleadings fails to comply with the statutory requirements and for that reason is ineffectual to create a lien. It is unnecessary to notice all the objections presented, as, in our judgment, one point urged is decisive of the case. Section 3669 of Hill's Code gives this remedy to one who has furnished material to be used in a building at the instance of the owner or of his agent, and provides that every contractor shall be held to be the agent of the owner. Section 3673 provides that every lumber merchant desiring the benefit of the act shall file with the county clerk a claim containing a true statement of his demand, with the name of the owner, the name of the person to whom he furnished the materials, and also a description of the property to be charged with said lien sufficient for identification, which claim shall be verified, etc. The plaintiff, desiring to avail himself of the benefit of this act, filed the following claim:
To continue reading
Request your trial- Portland & F.R. Co. v. Spillman
-
Rankin v. Malarkey
...P. 816 23 Or. 593 RANKIN v. MALARKEY et al. Supreme Court of OregonNovember 20, 1893 On rehearing. For report of decision on appeal, see 32 P. 620. Dan J. Malarkey, for Johnson & Idleman and H.G. Platt, for respondent. BEAN, J. The right to enforce a mechanic's lien against a building, for ......