Raser Techs., Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co., s. A14A2084

Decision Date30 March 2015
Docket NumberA14A2085.,Nos. A14A2084,s. A14A2084
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals
PartiesRASER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al. v. MORGAN STANLEY & COMPANY, LLC et al.; and vice versa.

Chamberlain Hrdlicka White Williams & Aughtry, Jimmy L. Paul, Drew V. Greene, David N. Dreyer, Scott M. Ratchick, for appellants.

Rodgers & Hardin, Richard H. Sinkfield, Dan F. Laney, for appellees.

Opinion

PHIPPS, Chief Judge.

In these cases, the following circumstances exist and are dispositive of the appeals:

(1) The evidence supports the judgments;

(2) The judgments of the court below adequately explain the decisions; and

(3) The issues are controlled adversely to the appellants for the reasons and authority given in the appellees' briefs.

The judgments of the court below therefore are affirmed in accordance with Court of Appeals Rule 36.

Judgments affirmed in both cases.

ELLINGTON, P.J., concurs.

McMILLIAN, J., concurs in judgment only.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Gregg v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • March 30, 2015
  • Potts v. State, A14A2350.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • March 30, 2015
    ... ... 6 Potts was tried separately from his co-indictees, and the evidence presented at his ... ...
  • Raser Techs. Inc. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.
    • United States
    • Utah Court of Appeals
    • February 17, 2022
    ...moved for reconsideration and then appealed. The Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed the order. See Raser Techs., Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co. , 331 Ga.App. 838, 771 S.E.2d 517 (2015).¶4 Raser then took up the Georgia trial court's offer and amended its complaint to include two claims (UPUAA ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT