Rash, Matter of

Decision Date18 October 1995
Docket NumberNo. 93-5396,93-5396
Citation68 F.3d 113
PartiesIn the Matter of Elray and Jean RASH, Debtors. ASSOCIATES COMMERCIAL CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Elray RASH and Jean E. Rash, Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Ben L. Aderhold, Tina Snelling, Hirsch, Glover, Robinson & Sheiness, Houston, TX, for appellant.

Rebecca A. Leigh, Houston, TX, for Amicus Curiae, MBCC.

Pamela A. Bassel, Dabney D. Bassel, Law, Snakard & Gambill, P.C., Ft. Worth, TX, Erin B. Shank, Nationsbank of Texas, N.A., Dallas, TX, for Nationsbank.

Robert E. Barron, Nederaland, TX, John J. Durkay, Mehaffy & Weber, Beaumont, TX, for appellee.

Norma L. Hammes, James J. Gold, San Jose, CA, for Amicus Curiae, National Assoc. of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas; Howell Cobb, Judge.

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion September 13, 1994, Modified August 16, 1995, 5

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, KING, JOLLY, DAVIS, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.*

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed.The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

*Judges Garwood, Higginbotham and Jones are recused and did not participate in this decision.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Rash, Matter of
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • July 30, 1996
    ...to determine whether the bankruptcy court erred, as a matter of law, in failing to value the Rashes' truck at its replacement cost. 68 F.3d 113 (5th Cir.1995). II. STANDARD OF REVIEW Although the bankruptcy appellate process makes this court the second level of review, we perform the identi......
  • In re Sharon
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Southern District of Ohio
    • July 30, 1996
    ...one of three methods of valuation: valuation at retail value, (see In re Rash, 31 F.3d 325 (5th Cir.1994), reh'g granted en banc 68 F.3d 113 (5th Cir.1995)); valuation at wholesale value, (see In re Mitchell, 954 F.2d 557 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 506 U.S. 908, 113 S.Ct. 303, 121 L.Ed.2d 226......
  • In re 203 North LaSalle Street Ltd. Partnership, Bankruptcy No. 95 B 4998.
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • December 5, 1995
    ...50 F.3d 530, 532 (8th Cir.1995); and In re Rash, 31 F.3d 325, 329 (5th Cir.1994), modified, 62 F.3d 685, reh'g en banc granted, 68 F.3d 113 (1995). The decisions cited by the bank primarily deal with the question of whether, for purposes of bifurcation under Section 506(a), the value of col......
  • Matter of Maddox
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of New Jersey
    • April 18, 1996
    ...Circuit in In re Rash, 31 F.3d 325 (5th Cir.1994), reh'g denied, opin. modified by 62 F.3d 685 (5th Cir.), reh'g granted en banc 68 F.3d 113 (5th Cir.1995) adopted the retail value or "replacement model" approach in determining the value of collateral that the debtor proposes to retain unde......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT