Rasnic v. ConocoPhillips Co.
| Docket Number | 20140032 |
| Decision Date | 26 September 2014 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
10 cases
-
Rice v. Neether
...legislative history. N.D.C.C. § 1–02–39. A statute is ambiguous if it is susceptible to different, rational meanings.2014 ND 181, ¶ 14, 854 N.W.2d 659. In enacting a statute, it is presumed that "[a] just reasonable result is intended." N.D.C.C. § 1–02–38(3). [¶ 11] Section 47–09–06, N.D.C.......
-
Cartwright v. Tong
...N.D.C.C. § 1–02–02 ; Greene v. Matthys , 2017 ND 107, ¶ 10, 893 N.W.2d 179 (quoting Rasnic v. ConocoPhillips Co. , 2014 ND 181, ¶ 14, 854 N.W.2d 659 ). "Words and phrases must be construed according to the context and the rules of grammar and the approved usage of the language." N.D.C.C. § ......
-
Oil & Gas Transfer L. L.C. v. Karr
...circumstances under which the legislation was enacted, and the legislative history." Rasnic v. ConocoPhillips Co. , 2014 ND 181, ¶14, 854 N.W.2d 659, 662. If a lien-related statute is ambiguous, we also must construe it liberally in favor of the individual or entity that contributed labor, ......
-
Chapman v. Hiland Partners GP Holdings, LLC
...intent when the contract was executed, ascertaining the intent from the written contract alone, if possible. Rasnic v. ConocoPhillips Co. , 854 N.W.2d 659, 661 (N.D. 2014) (citing N.D. Cent. Code §§ 9-07-03 and 9-07-04 ). Words in a written contract are given their plain, ordinary, and comm......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
CHAPTER 15 OVERVIEW OF COMPLICATING FACTORS AFFECTING TITLE
...38-35-117; N.D. Cent. Code § 35-01-08; Cliff & Co. v. Anderson, 777 P.2d 595, 601 n.8 (Wyo. 1989). [43] See Rasnic v. ConocoPhillips Co., 854 N.W.2d 659 (N.D. 2014) (finding that the plain language of the foreclosed mortgage applied only to mineral interest owned by the mortgagors when the ......