Rauch v. Hearne, 2646.
| Decision Date | 26 July 1945 |
| Docket Number | No. 2646.,2646. |
| Citation | Rauch v. Hearne, 189 S.W.2d 342 (Tex. App. 1945) |
| Parties | RAUCH v. HEARNE. |
| Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Hill County; J. D. Stephenson, Judge.
Suit by Will F. Hearne against Mrs. Leslye Rauch, administratrix of the estate of W. H. Webb, deceased, to establish an indebtedness against decedent's estate.Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
Judgment affirmed.
Herman Eastland, Jr., and R. W. Calvert, both of Hillsboro, for appellant.
J. Rob Griffin, of Fort Worth, for appellee.
Will F. Hearne, appellee, claiming under his deceased mother, Stella W. Hearne, a creditor of the estate of W. H. Webb, deceased, brought this suit against appellant, Mrs. Leslye Rauch, in her capacity as administratrix de bonis non of the estate of W. H. Webb, deceased, to establish an indebtedness claimed by him against said estate.
Appellant defended on the ground that the debt sued on was barred by the four year statute of limitation.
Trial was had to the court resulting in a judgment in favor of appellee, and appellant has appealed.Other than the findings incorporated in the court's judgment and hereinafter referred to, no findings of fact or conclusions of law were filed by the trial court, and none were requested.
The sole question presented by this appeal is the alleged error of the trial court in failing to find that appellee's claim was barred by the four year statute of limitation.
W. H. Webb and wife, Catherine Webb, had nine children, among whom were Stella W. Hearne, M. W. Webb and W. W. Webb.Catherine Webb died intestate prior to the death of her husband, and no administration was had of her estate.
W. H. Webb departed this life in the year 1933.His will was duly probated and his sons, W. W. Webb and M. W. Webb, qualified as independent executors of his estate.M. W. Webb died in January, 1941; W. W. Webb died October 9, 1943; and from the date of the latter's death there was no one in charge of or administering the estate of W. H. Webb, deceased, until on or about April 5, 1944, an administrator de bonis non was appointed and qualified and subsequently resigned.Thereafter, in June, 1944, appellant qualified as administratrix de bonis non of the estate of W. H. Webb, deceased.
In December, 1936, Stella W. Hearne, as her part of the estate of her deceased mother and father, received (in addition to another note not here involved) a note for $2500, payable to her order on January 1, 1938, bearing interest from date at the rate of ten per cent, signed W. H. Webb Estate, M. W. Webb, Executor, W. W. Webb, Executor, "individual and independent executors of the estate of W. H. Webb, deceased."This note was secured by a deed of trust of even date therewith on lots one and two, block seventeen of the original town of Itasca, Texas, and was executed in all respects as the note above described.This deed of trust recited that the lien thereby created was second and inferior to a lien on the real estate therein described securing a debt of the estate of W. H. Webb held by the American National Insurance Company.
The following stipulations, among others, were made during the course of the trial:
"That Paul McCown, as administrator de bonis non of the estate of W. H. Webb, deceased, made application to the probate court for authority to sell lots one and two, block seventeen, original town of Itasca, Texas, which authority was granted, and subsequently Paul McCown did sell said property and out of the proceeds of such sale and the money belonging to the estate then in the bank, paid the debt of the American National Insurance Company", and other costs and expenses, and that appellant in her capacity as administratrix of said estate "has on hand the balance of the proceeds of said sale, less expenses, and which balance is less than $2201.11, and that there are no other claims that have been approved or allowed by the Administrator and filed with the County Clerk against the estate of W. H. Webb, deceased.
After her death there was found among the papers of Stella W. Hearne the following letter:
The renewal of this loan is going to cost nearly $100.00 for attys fees and supplemental abstract.The abstract cost $50.00 and attys fees $30.00.I made Pat Hookstrustee for you and you can send these papers to him or to me just as you like.
A letter from Mrs. Hearne, dated September 27, 1938, to Mr. Pat E. Hooks, Itasca, Texas, was introduced in evidence and reads as follows:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Schultze v. Schultze
...be estopped from pleading limitation the same as an individual debtor, is recognized in Kyle v. House, 38 Tex. 155, and in Rauch v. Hearne, TexCiv.App., 189 S.W.2d 342, writ denied, the latter case being strikingly similar on the facts to this case. See also Martin v. Dial, Tex.Com.App., 57......
-
Long Trusts v. Griffin
...Inc., 442 S.W.2d 406 (Tex.Civ.App.-Amarillo 1969, writ ref'd n.r.e.) (holding, after trial, that estoppel was not proved); Rauch v. Hearne, 189 S.W.2d 342 (Tex.Civ.App.-Waco 1945, writ ref'd w.o.m.). Additionally, the trial court found that the Griffins instituted suit for specific performa......
-
Long Trusts v. Griffin, No. 06-02-00185-CV (TX 8/18/2004)
...Inc., 442 S.W.2d 406 (Tex. Civ. App.—Amarillo 1969, writ ref'd n.r.e.) (holding, after trial, that estoppel was not proved); Rauch v. Hearne, 189 S.W.2d 342 (Tex. Civ. App.—Waco 1945, writ ref'd w.o.m.). Additionally, the trial court found that the Griffins instituted suit for specific perf......
-
Dobbs v. Russell
...1873, 38 Tex. 155;, Schultze v. Schultze, Tex.Civ.App., Eastland, 1948, 209 S.W.2d 791, writ ref. n. r. e.; and Rauch v. Hearne, Tex.Civ.App., Waco, 1945, 189 S.W.2d 342, writ ref. w. m. Another case cited is Stamps v. Varelas, Tex.Civ.App., San Antonio, 1958, 313 S.W.2d 141, as to which pr......