Ray v. State

Decision Date30 July 1981
Docket NumberNo. 57795,57795
Citation403 So.2d 956
PartiesJohn Hunter RAY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
293 cases
  • Nurse v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 5, 1995
    ...lesser included offenses as a matter of judicial implication. First, Florida case law strongly supports this conclusion. In Ray v. State, 403 So.2d 956 (Fla.1981), the Florida Supreme Court held that a lewd assault on a child under fourteen, under Section 800.04, Florida Statutes (1975), wa......
  • People v. Toro
    • United States
    • California Supreme Court
    • January 30, 1989
    ...a finding of a nonincluded offense may constitute a consent and bar the minor from raising a due process claim on appeal]; Ray v. State (Fla.1981) 403 So.2d 956, 961 [instructing on a nonincluded offense may not be cited as error on appeal if the defendant had an opportunity to object to th......
  • Torrence v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 4, 1983
    ...the instruction was fundamental and requires reversal of the conviction in the absence of an objection. 4 We believe that Ray v. State, 403 So.2d 956 (Fla.1981), controls this In that case, Ray was charged with sexual battery and the trial court instructed on commission of a lewd and lasciv......
  • Connolly v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 29, 2015
    ...Supreme Court cautioned the appellate courts to exercise their discretion concerning fundamental error “ ‘very guardedly,’ ” 403 So.2d 956, 960 (Fla.1981) (quoting Sanford v. Rubin, 237 So.2d 134, 137 (Fla.1970) ), and “only in the rare cases where jurisdictional error appears or where the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Dui defense
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Florida Small-Firm Practice Tools - Volume 1-2 Volume 2
    • April 1, 2023
    ...the improper charge or relied on that charge as evidenced by counsel’s argument to the jury or other affirmative action. [ Ray v. State , 403 So. 2d 956, 961 (Fla. 1991).] In a non-jury trial, the trial court has the inherent authority to find the defendant guilty of a lesser included offen......
  • Avoiding fundamentally erroneous jury instructions: pointers for counsel in criminal trials and appeals.
    • United States
    • Florida Bar Journal Vol. 81 No. 7, July 2007
    • July 1, 2007
    ...it into a 'mere pretense of a trial' [or] ... strike at the fundamental legality of the trial itself." (4) The court in Ray v. State, 403 So. 2d 956, 960 (Fla. 1981), emphasized that "the error must amount to a denial of due process" to be Fundamental error ... [is] "error which goes to the......
  • The appellate decision-making process.
    • United States
    • Florida Bar Journal Vol. 80 No. 4, April 2006
    • April 1, 2006
    ...(See Fla. R. APP. P. 9.140(i)); and 2) when the evidence is insufficient to show that a crime was committed. (8) E.g., Ray v. State, 403 So. 2d 956 (Fla. 1981); Sanford v. Rubin, 237 So. 2d 134 (Fla. (9) See, e.g., Murphy v. Int'l Robotic Sys., Inc., 766 So. 2d 1010, 1030 (Fla. 2000)(Closin......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT