Read v. Jerauld County
Citation | 17 N.W.2d 269,70 S.D. 298 |
Decision Date | 12 January 1945 |
Docket Number | 8740 |
Parties | ELBERT A. READ, Respondent, v. JERAULD COUNTY, et al., Appellants. |
Court | Supreme Court of South Dakota |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jerauld County, SD
#8740—Affirmed
Chas. R. Hatch, Wessington Springs, SD
Attorney for Appellants.
Royhl & Longstaff, Huron, SD
Attorneys for Respondent.
Opinion Filed Jan 12, 1945
Plaintiff was the owner of a quarter section of land in Jerauld County, which was sold on December 21, 1931, for delinquent taxes. The statutory right of redemption was not exercised and as a result the county treasurer issued to Jerauld County a tax deed dated June 4, 1938. Upon tender of the full amount of taxes and costs included in the tax sale certificate and of subsequent taxes levied and assessed, plaintiff demanded of the county a conveyance by quit claim deed of the title acquired by the county. He asserted that right under the provisions of Chapter 46, Laws 1943. The board of county commissioners at its meeting on September 7, 1943, rejected the tender and demand to convey. After the foregoing proceedings plaintiff brought this action claiming a preferred right to purchase. Defendants answered denying such right. The case was submitted to the court upon a stipulation of facts. The court ruled that it was the mandatory duty of the county commissioners to authorize a conveyance and entered judgment accordingly.
It is contended by defendants that there is no mandatory obligation on the part of a county to convey to a former owner; that if the statute is mandatory it has no application after the expiration of the time within which claim to possession of real property sold for nonpayment of taxes may be asserted; and that the provisions of the 1943 law remitting penalty and interest are violative of the Constitution.
In 1939, the Legislature provided for conveyance of tax acquired property to former owners without the necessity of complying with the general provisions authorizing county commissioners to sell such property. The statute referred to, SDC 57.1125, contained these provisions:
This section was amended by Chapter 292, Laws of 1943, by replacing the words “the record owner” with the words “the record owner or his assignees or successors.”
Chapter 46, Laws of 1943, reads as follows:
When land is sold for taxes and a tax sale certificate is issued to a private purchaser the taxes are paid and the state and the local taxing districts hold no liens thereafter for the payment of taxes. The sale of land to a county is merely a process of enforcing the collection of taxes. The taxes remain unpaid until redemption is made, the certificate is assigned or the land is sold .by the county after title is acquired by tax deed. Brink v. Dann et al., 33 SD 81, 144 NW 734; Hughes County v. Henry, 48 SD 98, 202 NW 286; Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. Hoilien, 60 SD 183, 244 NW 116. There is no merit in the contention of the defendants that the expiration of the three-year statute of limitations (SDC 57.0903, amended by Chap. 337, Laws of 1941) prevented the operation of the provisions governing sales to former owners. The legislature may regulate or change at any time the method of selling or disposing of properties to which counties have acquired title by tax proceedings.
It is argued that since the provisions of Chapter 46, supra, were permissive in...
To continue reading
Request your trial