Reagan v. Abourezk

Decision Date19 October 1987
Docket NumberNo. 86-656,86-656
Citation98 L.Ed.2d 1,484 U.S. 1,108 S.Ct. 252
PartiesRonald W. REAGAN, et al., petitioners, v. James ABOUREZK et al
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

On writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment below is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Justice BLACKMUN took no part in the decision of this case. Justice SCALIA took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

To continue reading

Request your trial
59 cases
  • HOUSING AUTH. OF THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY v. Jackson
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey
    • October 29, 1990
    ...evading review'"). See also Abourezk v. Reagan, 785 F.2d 1043, 1052 (D.C.Cir.1986), aff'd by an equally divided court, 484 U.S. 1, 108 S.Ct. 252, 98 L.Ed.2d 1 (1987); Cerro Wire & Cable Co. v. FERC, 677 F.2d 124, 127 n. 2 (D.C.Cir. 1982); cf. Yearsley v. Scranton Housing Authority, 487 F.Su......
  • Rafeedie v. INS
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • June 15, 1988
    ...This is a conduct—not a status-based provision. See Abourezk v. Reagan, 785 F.2d 1043, 1054 (D.C.Cir.1986), aff'd mem., ___ U.S. ___, 108 S.Ct. 252, 98 L.Ed.2d 1 (1987); see also Allende v. Shultz, 845 F.2d 1111 (2d Cir.1988). Defendants do not allege in this case that plaintiff has directl......
  • Doe v. Trump
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Oregon
    • November 26, 2019
    ...those statutory and constitutional boundaries lie." Abourezk v. Reagan , 785 F.2d 1043, 1061 (D.C. Cir. 1986), aff'd , 484 U.S. 1, 108 S.Ct. 252, 98 L.Ed.2d 1 (1987). Whatever deference we accord to the President's immigration and national security policy judgments does not preclude us from......
  • American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee v. Reno
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Central District of California
    • January 24, 1995
    ...information. But see Abourezk v. Reagan, 785 F.2d 1043, 1060-61 (D.C.Cir.1986), aff'd mem. by an equally divided court, 484 U.S. 1, 108 S.Ct. 252, 98 L.Ed.2d 1 (1987). Even if the state secrets privilege is inapplicable in this case, the Court holds that there is an alternative basis for co......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Enemy aliens.
    • United States
    • Stanford Law Review Vol. 54 No. 5, May 2002
    • May 1, 2002
    ...on the rights of U.S. citizens to exchange ideas with him); Abourezk v. Reagan, 785 F.2d 1043 (D.C. Cir. 1986) (same), aff'd per curiam, 484 U.S. 1 (1987); Steven R. Shapiro, Ideological Exclusions: Closing the Border to Political Dissidents, 100 HARV. L. REV. 930 (68.) See Immigration and ......
  • How Does Immigration Law Today Affect Your Domestic Law Practice?
    • United States
    • Kansas Bar Association KBA Bar Journal No. 72-5, May 2003
    • Invalid date
    ...1999)[Distinguished Abourezk v. Reagan, 785 F.2d 1043 (D.C. Cir.1986), aff'd per curiam by an equally divided court, Reagan v. Abourezk, 108 S.Ct. 252(1987) and finding no review of decision to grant or to revoke a visa; noting that traditionally these were matters for diplomatic protest]. ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT