Reagan v. El Paso & N. E. Ry. Co.

Decision Date06 January 1910
CourtNew Mexico Supreme Court
PartiesREAGANv.EL PASO & N. E. RY. CO. et al.

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from District Court, Otero County; before Justice Edward A. Mann.

Action by James Reagan against the El Paso & Northeastern Railway Company and another. From a judgment for plaintiff against the defendant named, it appeals. Reversed and remanded.

In actions sounding in tort plaintiff must prove the injuries complained of, and also who committed them.

W. A. Hawkins and John Franklin, for appellant. John W. Thompson, for appellee.

MILLS, C. J.

This is a suit for damages, brought by James Reagan to recover from the El Paso & Northeastern Railway Company, and the El Paso & Northeastern Railroad Company, for the killing of a mare and the injury to a jack, caused by a train run by the defendants, their agents or servants. The cause was heard by a jury, which returned a verdict for $300 in favor of the plaintiff and against the El Paso & Northeastern Railway Company. The railway company filed a motion for a new trial, and, on motion being overruled, took an appeal to this court.

In the motion for a new trial, nine alleged errors are assigned; but we will only consider the second, as the others relate to instructions either given or refused by the court, and, as the instructions are not brought up with the transcript, we cannot consider them.

The second error assigned is that the trial court erred in not sustaining appellant's motion for a new trial, because the evidence in the case does not show that the mare was killed or the jack injured by the defendants or either of them, or by their or either of their servants, agents, or employés, and that the only evidence upon this fact tends to show that the mare was killed and the jack injured by the El Paso & Southwestern Railway Company. We have carefully examined the record before us in this case and can find no evidence to show that the mare was killed or the jack injured by the defendant companies, or their servants, agents, or employés. There is nothing in the record to show that the El Paso & Northeastern Railway Company, or the El Paso & Northeastern Railroad Company, either owned or operated the railroad where it is alleged the accidents to the animals occurred. What little evidence there is concerning this point shows that the mare was killed and the jack injured by the El Paso & Southwestern Railroad Company, and not by the defendant companies. The witness McCallum, who testified for the plaintiff, on page 38 of the transcript, says: “Q. What railroad are you connected with? A. El Paso & Southwestern. Q. Is that this railroad running through here? A. Yes, sir. Q. And the only one running through here? A. That is the only one I see.” And the witness Wahlenburg, also a witness for the plaintiff, testified, as shown on page 52 of the transcript,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Trujillo v. Baldonado
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of New Mexico
    • 18 Diciembre 1980
    ...in this appeal. The only case in New Mexico relating to the failure of an appellant to bring the instructions up is Reagan v. Railway Co., 15 N.M. 270, 106 P. 376 (1910). The railway company filed a motion for a new trial, and the motion being overruled, it took an appeal. The court In the ......
  • Wallace v. Wanek
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of New Mexico
    • 17 Abril 1970
    ...Pentecost v. Hudson, 57 N.M. 7, 252 P.2d 511 (1953). Before plaintiff can recover he must prove his case. Reagan v. El Paso & N.E. Ry. Co., 15 N.M. 270, 106 P. 376 (1910). Section 20--2--5, supra, does not place either the burden of producing evidence or the burden of persuasion on the dece......
  • Reagan v. El Paso & N.E. Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • New Mexico Supreme Court
    • 6 Enero 1910

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT