Reagh v. Hamilton
| Court | Washington Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM. |
| Citation | Reagh v. Hamilton, 78 P.2d 559, 194 Wash. 707 (Wash. 1938) |
| Decision Date | 20 April 1938 |
| Docket Number | 26842. |
| Parties | John D. REAGH, John L. Burnside, and Nellie M. Burnside, as Trustees under the Will of Charles Schalkenbach, Deceased, Respondents, v. George W. HAMILTON, as Attorney General of the State of Washington, Defendant (Mollie Peirce MOLLER, Intervener-Appellant. |
Department 2.
Appeal from Superior Court, Thurston County; D. F. Wright, Judge.
James G. Mulroy, of Seattle, for appellant.
Matthew Stafford, of Seattle, for respondents.
This appeal has been considered and effectually disposed of in our opinion, this day filed, in No. 26973. 78 P.2d 555.
The judgment involved in the instant appeal will be affirmed for the reasons therein stated. Although this judgment was prematurely entered, it would be an idle gesture to reverse it, in view of our holding in No. 26973 that appellant had no right to intervene.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Reagh v. Hamilton
...action therein set forth, with prejudice. The intervener appealed from that order, which appeal is now pending in this court as cause No. 26842, 78 P.2d 559. that appeal was taken, however, plaintiffs had moved to strike from the order that portion dismissing the cause of action set up in t......