Real Silk Hosiery Mills v. City of Portland
Decision Date | 25 May 1925 |
Docket Number | No. 417,417 |
Citation | 268 U.S. 325,69 L.Ed. 982,45 S.Ct. 525 |
Parties | REAL SILK HOSIERY MILLS, Inc., v. CITY OF PORTLAND et al |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Messrs. John G. Milburn, of New York City, and Joseph Simon and John M. Gearin, both of Portland, Or., for appellant.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 326-329 intentionally omitted] Mr. Frank S. Grant, of Portland, Or., for appellees.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 330-334 intentionally omitted] Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.
Appellant is an Illinois corporation engaged in manufacturing silk hosiery at Indianapolis, Ind., and selling it throughout the United States to consumers only. It employs duly accredited representatives in many states who go from house to house soliciting and accepting orders. When a willing purchaser is found, the solicitor fills out and signs in duplicate a so-called 'order blank.' This obligates appellant to make delivery of the specified goods and, among other things, states:
One of the copies is left with the purchaser; the other is first sent to the local sales manager and then forwarded to the mills at Indianapolis. In response thereto the goods are packed and shipped by parcel post c. o. d. direct to the purchaser. The solicitor retains the cash deposit, and this constitutes his entire compensation.
The appelland employs 2,000 representatives who solicit in most of the important cities and towns throughout the Union, and has built up a very large business $10,000,000 per annum. Twenty operate in Portland, Or.
May 16, 1923, that city passed an ordinance which requires that every person who goes from place to place taking orders for goods for future delivery and receives payment or any deposit of money in advance shall secure a license and file a bond. The license fee is $12.50 quarterly for each person on foot and $25 if he uses a vehicle. The bond must be in the penal sum of $500 and conditioned to make final delivery of ordered goods, etc.
By a bill filed in the United States District Court for Oregon, appellant challenged the ordinance and asked that its enforcement be restrained upon the ground, among others, that it interferes with and burdens interstate commerce and is repugnant to article 1, § 8, federal Constitution. The trial court upheld the enactment and sustained a motion to dismiss the bill. This was affirmed by the Circuit...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Federal Compress & Warehouse Co. v. McLean
... ... 559, 146 Miss ... 442; City Sales Agency v. Smith, 88 So. 626, 126 ... Miss ... 198, 69 L.Ed. 914; Real Silk Hosiery Mills v ... Portland, 268 U.S ... ...
-
Tenn. Wine & Spirits Retailers Ass'n v. Thomas
...requirement statutes); Brief for State of Illinois et al. as Amici Curiae 24 (same).21 Real Silk Hosiery Mills v. Portland , 268 U.S. 325, 335–336, 45 S.Ct. 525, 69 L.Ed. 982 (1925) (license tax on solicitors of orders to be filled by an out-of-state manufacturer); Shafer v. Farmers' Grain ......
-
Freeman v. Hewit
...9 See e.g., Robbins v. Taxing District of Shelby County, 120 U.S. 489, 7 S.Ct. 592, 30 L.Ed. 694; Real Silk Hosiery Mills v. City of Portland, 268 U.S. 325, 45 S.Ct. 525, 69 L.Ed. 982; Nippert v. City of Richmond, 327 U.S. 416, 66 S.Ct. 586, 162 A.L.R. 844, and authorities 10 See Ribble, su......
-
State ex rel Battle v. B. D. Bailey & Sons, Inc.
...479, 59 L.Ed. 795; Cheney Brothers Company v. Massachusetts, 246 U.S. 147, 38 S.Ct. 295, 62 L.Ed. 632; Real Silk, Hosiery Mills v. Portland, 268 U.S. 325, 45 S.Ct. 525, 69 L.Ed. 982; Best & Company, Inc. v. Maxwell, 311 U.S. 454, 61 S.Ct. 334, 85 L.Ed. 275; Nippert v. Richmond, 327 U.S. 416......
-
State and Local Regulation of Religious Solicitation of Funds: A Constitutional Perspective
...80. Nippert v. City of Richmond, 327 U.S. 416 (1946); Real Silk Hosiery Mills v. City 77. See, for example, Gibson v. Florida of Portland, 268 U.S. 325 (1925). Legislative Investigation, 372 U.S. 539 81. One case, Breard v. City of Alexandria, (1963); NAACP v. Button, 371 U.S. 415 341 U.S. ......