Real Truth About Obama, Inc. v. Fed. Election Comm'n
Citation | 559 U.S. 1089,130 S.Ct. 2371 (Mem),176 L.Ed.2d 764 |
Decision Date | 26 April 2010 |
Docket Number | No. 09–724.,09–724. |
Parties | The REAL TRUTH ABOUT OBAMA, INC., petitioner, v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, et al. |
Court | United States Supreme Court |
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of Citizens United v. Federal Election Comm'n, 558 U.S. 310, 130 S.Ct. 876, 175 L.Ed.2d 753 (2010)
and the Solicitor General's suggestion of mootness.
To continue reading
Request your trial672 cases
- Action NC v. Strach, 1:15-cv-1063
- Guilford Coll. v. McAleenan
- Sarsour v. Trump
- Int'l Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump, Civil Action No. TDC–17–0361
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
An Empirical Look at Preliminary Injunctions in Challenges Under Environmental Protection Laws
...29. Id . at 23. 30. See , e.g. , Real Truth About Obama, Inc. v. Federal Election Comm’n, 575 F.3d 342, 347 (4th Cir. 2009), vacated , 559 U.S. 1089 (2010), adhered to in part sub nom . Real Truth About Obama, Inc. v. F.E.C., 607 F.3d 355 (4th Cir. 2010) (“ Winter articulates four requireme......
-
Judicial Relief and Remedies
...90 . Real Truth About Obama, Inc. v. Federal Election Comm’n, 575 F.3d 342, 347 (4th Cir. 2009), cert. granted , judgment vacated , 559 U.S. 1089 (2010), and adhered to in part sub nom . The Real Truth About Obama, Inc. v. F.E.C., 607 F.3d 355 (4th Cir. 2010) (holding that the circuit’s pri......
-
WITHHOLDING INJUNCTIONS IN COPYRIGHT CASES: IMPACTS OF EBAY.
...the plaintiff. Cf. Real Truth About Obama, Inc. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 575 F.3d 342, 345-46 (4th Cir. 2009), vacated on other grounds, 559 U.S. 1089 (2010) (likelihood of success on the merits necessary); Salinger v. Colting, 607 F.3d 68, 79 (2d Cir. 2010) (accepting a serious question go......