Rebel v. Big Tarkio Drainage Dist. of Holt City, No. WD
| Court | Court of Appeal of Missouri (US) |
| Writing for the Court | SHANGLER |
| Citation | 602 S.W.2d 787 |
| Parties | Dwayne H. REBEL, Appellant, v. BIG TARKIO DRAINAGE DISTRICT OF HOLT CITY, Missouri, Emit Haer, Ivan Ohlensehlen, Bryan H. Hinkle, R. C. "Dick" Yount and Edwin Wright, Supervisors of Said District, Respondents. 30855. |
| Docket Number | No. WD |
| Decision Date | 08 July 1980 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
27 practice notes
-
Frank v. Environmental Sanitation Management, Inc., No. 66244
...The focus is defendant's unreasonable interference with the use and enjoyment of plaintiff's land. Rebel v. Big Tarkio Drainage District, 602 S.W.2d 787, 791 (Mo.App.1980). Nuisance is an effect rather than a cause of tort liability and conduct antecedent to the interference may be irreleva......
-
Baker v. Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority, BURBANK-GLENDALE-PASADENA
...404 A.2d 1064; Drybread v. City of St. Louis (Mo.App.1982) 634 S.W.2d 519, 520-521; Rebel v. Big Tarkio Drainage Dist. (Mo.App.1980) 602 S.W.2d 787, 792-793; Sundell v. Town of New London (1979) 119 N.H. 839, 409 A.2d 1315, 1320-1321; Aguayo v. Village of Chama (1969) 79 N.M. 729, 731, 449 ......
-
Washington Suburban Sanitary Com'n v. CAE-Link Corp., CAE-LINK
...268 N.E.2d 680 (1971); Maerz v. United States Steel Corp., 116 Mich.App. 710, 323 N.W.2d 524 (1982); Rebel v. Big Tarkio Drainage Dist., 602 S.W.2d 787 (Mo.App.1980); Hall v. Phillips, 231 Neb. 269, 436 N.W.2d 139 (1989); Burke v. Briggs, 239 N.J.Super. 269, 571 A.2d 296 (1990); Copart Ind.......
-
Fletcher v. City of Independence, No. WD
...of the action is the unreasonable interference with the use and enjoyment of land. Rebel v. Big Tarkio Drainage District of Holt City, 602 S.W.2d 787, 791[7-10] (Mo.App.1980). Nuisance describes an effect, not a cause of tort liability, so that conduct antecedent to the interference may not......
Request a trial to view additional results
27 cases
-
Frank v. Environmental Sanitation Management, Inc., No. 66244
...The focus is defendant's unreasonable interference with the use and enjoyment of plaintiff's land. Rebel v. Big Tarkio Drainage District, 602 S.W.2d 787, 791 (Mo.App.1980). Nuisance is an effect rather than a cause of tort liability and conduct antecedent to the interference may be irreleva......
-
Baker v. Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority, BURBANK-GLENDALE-PASADENA
...404 A.2d 1064; Drybread v. City of St. Louis (Mo.App.1982) 634 S.W.2d 519, 520-521; Rebel v. Big Tarkio Drainage Dist. (Mo.App.1980) 602 S.W.2d 787, 792-793; Sundell v. Town of New London (1979) 119 N.H. 839, 409 A.2d 1315, 1320-1321; Aguayo v. Village of Chama (1969) 79 N.M. 729, 731, 449 ......
-
Washington Suburban Sanitary Com'n v. CAE-Link Corp., CAE-LINK
...268 N.E.2d 680 (1971); Maerz v. United States Steel Corp., 116 Mich.App. 710, 323 N.W.2d 524 (1982); Rebel v. Big Tarkio Drainage Dist., 602 S.W.2d 787 (Mo.App.1980); Hall v. Phillips, 231 Neb. 269, 436 N.W.2d 139 (1989); Burke v. Briggs, 239 N.J.Super. 269, 571 A.2d 296 (1990); Copart Ind.......
-
Fletcher v. City of Independence, No. WD
...of the action is the unreasonable interference with the use and enjoyment of land. Rebel v. Big Tarkio Drainage District of Holt City, 602 S.W.2d 787, 791[7-10] (Mo.App.1980). Nuisance describes an effect, not a cause of tort liability, so that conduct antecedent to the interference may not......
Request a trial to view additional results