Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. Gossett
Decision Date | 12 January 1938 |
Docket Number | No. 7302.,7302. |
Citation | 111 S.W.2d 1066 |
Parties | RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION v. GOSSETT, Banking Commissioner, et al. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Andrews, Kelley, Kurth & Campbell, of Houston, Birkhead, Beckmann, Stanard & Vance, of San Antonio, Turney, Burges, Culwell & Pollard, of El Paso, and Aldredge, Shults & Madden, of Dallas, for relator.
Ocie Speer and William McCraw, Attys. Gen., and Scott Gaines, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondents.
This proceeding involves construction of a certain income debenture issued by the Guaranty Bond State Bank, of Miles, Tex., to the Reconstruction Finance Corporation.
Relator, Reconstruction Finance Corporation, seeks a writ of mandamus against respondent, Z. Gossett, in his capacity as Banking Commissioner and as statutory receiver for the Guaranty Bond State Bank, of Miles, Tex., to compel the Banking Commissioner to pay the sum of $13,253.75 to the relator, to be applied on its indebtedness evidenced by the proof of claim filed with and approved by the respondent. The record consists of relator's sworn petition and respondent's sworn answer, which disclose that the facts are undisputed, and only questions of law are presented to this court for determination.
During the late depression the federal government greatly enlarged its field of activity in extending financial aid to certain business interests. The Reconstruction Finance Corporation was one of the governmental agencies created for that purpose. This form of debenture was part of the program originated by the federal government, through this corporation, to assist banks and avoid, if possible, the disastrous results of a widespread depression. The debenture is quite lengthy, and frequently refers to the various sections thereof, and, in order to get the intention of the parties expressed in such instrument, it is necessary to set out verbatim most of the sections contained therein. As to the others, we shall merely summarize their contents.
The Guaranty Bond State Bank will be designated as bank, Reconstruction Finance Corporation as relator, and Z. Gossett as respondent.
This debenture is dated January 23, 1934, and begins with the statement that the bank "hereby promises to pay to Reconstruction Finance Corporation, or registered assigns, on August 1, 1953, at the principal office of the Bank in the city of Miles, Texas, the principal amount of Fifty Thousand dollars ($50,000), and to pay to the registered holder hereof interest on said principal amount, but only in accordance with the provisions set forth below, payable semi-annually at said office on each February 1 and August 1, from the date of this Debenture at the rate of five per cent per annum and no more."
Section 1 treats of the authority of the bank to issue such $50,000 debenture, and to incur other indebtedness under the restrictions contained therein.
We quote from the debenture the following sections:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. Schuenemann
...(Tex.1978); Anderson Kerr Drilling Co. v. Bruhlmeyer, 134 Tex. 574, 136 S.W.2d 800, 801, 805 (1940); Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Gossett, 130 Tex. 535, 111 S.W.2d 1066, 1074 (1938). Although at the outset we construed all three instruments together to determine the entire agreement betw......
-
Emscor Mfg., Inc. v. Alliance Ins. Group
...obligation to pay, or for which one is liable." BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY 823 (5th ed. 1979) (citing Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Gossett, 130 Tex. 535, 111 S.W.2d 1066, 1073 (1938)). None of the correspondence described by Emscor obligated it, legally or otherwise, to pay the underlying Wh......
-
Hovel v. Batzri
...is Applied InconsistentlyThe Texas Supreme Court has noted that the term “debt” is ambiguous.11 See Reconstruction Fin. v. Gossett, 130 Tex. 535, 111 S.W.2d 1066, 1073 (1938) ; Barber v. City of East Dallas, 83 Tex. 147, 18 S.W. 438, 439 (1892). This ambiguity led the Austin court of appeal......
-
Thomas C. Vadakin v. Joyce L. Vadakin
... ... AT THE ... CORPORATION'S BOOK VALUE FOR PURPOSES OF APPLYING THE ... TERMS OF THE PARTIES" ... (Sup.Ct. 1909), 119 N.Y.S. 598, 599; Reconstruction ... Finance Corp. v. Gossett (Tex. 1938), 111 S.W.2d 1066, ... ...