Redcay v. State Bd. Of Educ.
| Decision Date | 23 March 1944 |
| Docket Number | No. 30.,30. |
| Parties | Paul I. REDCAY, Appellant, v. STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, etc., Respondent. |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from Supreme Court.
Lester C. Leonard, of Asbury Park, for appellant.
David T. Wilentz, Atty. Gen., and Lawrence A. Carton, Jr., of Newark (Arthur T. Vanderbilt, of Newark, of counsel), for respondents.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court, reported at 130 N.J.L. 369, 33 A.2d 120.
For affirmance: The CHANCELLOR, Justices PARKER, CASE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, and PORTER, and Judges DEAR, WELLS, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, and DILL-13.
For reversal: None.
To continue reading
Request your trial
11 cases
-
Laba v. Board of Educ. of Newark
... ... David D. Furman, Deputy Atty. Gen., argued the cause for State Commissioner of Education (Grover C. Richman, Jr., Atty. Gen., of New Jersey, attorney) ... The opinion of the court was delivered ... Redcay" v. State Board of Education, 130 N.J.L. 369, 33 A.2d 120 (Sup.Ct.1943), affirmed 131 N.J.L. 326, 36 A.2d 428 (E. & A.1944) ... Page 386 ... \xC2" ... ...
-
Wright v. Superintending School Committee, City of Portland
...255 P. 516 (1927)): and prior misconduct (Redcay v. State Board of Education, 130 N.J.L. 369, 33 A.2d 120, aff'd. without op., 131 N.J.L. 326, 36 A.2d 428 (1944)). The Redcay Court in rejecting the argument that incidents occurring prior to the creation of the teaching contract should not b......
-
Rogers v. Board of Education, (SC 16176)
...analysis; one serious incident can suffice. See Redcay v. Board of Education, 130 N.J.L. 369, 370, 33 A.2d 120 (1943), aff d, 131 N.J.L. 326, 36 A.2d 428 (1944); In re Shurgin, 83 App. Div. 2d 665, 666, 442 N.Y.S.2d 212 (1981), aff'd, 56 N.Y.2d 700, 436 N.E.2d 1324, 451 N.Y.S.2d 722 Althoug......
-
Kopera v. Board of Ed. of Town of West Orange, Essex County
...a protection, not a contract. Redcay v. State Board of Education, 130 N.J.L. 369, 33 A.2d 120 (Sup.Ct.1943), affirmed 131 N.J.L. 326, 36 A.2d 428 (E. & A.1944). As a status, tenure protects all teachers who have it, the merely adequate as much as the excellent. However, that does not give a......
Request a trial to view additional results