Redding v. Saunders

Decision Date17 March 1995
Citation213 A.D.2d 1015,625 N.Y.S.2d 115
PartiesLinda REDDING, individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian and Administratrix of the Estate of Teresa Felicia Hazel, Deceased Infant, Respondent, v. David G. SAUNDERS, M.D., Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Fager and Amsler by John Powers, New York City, for appellant.

The Law Office of Charles L. Davis by Charles Davis, Buffalo, for respondent.

Before GREEN, J.P., and PINE, CALLAHAN, DOERR and DAVIS, JJ.

MEMORANDUM:

Defendant moved to dismiss the complaint alleging medical malpractice because of plaintiff's untimely service of the complaint in response to his demand. Plaintiff, acting pro se, cross-moved to compel defendant to accept late service of the complaint, asserting in an affidavit that she was not aware of the time constraints on service of the complaint. Plaintiff also submitted unsworn medical records.

The complaint should have been dismissed for failure to provide a reasonable excuse for the delay or a sufficient affidavit of merit (see, Kel Mgt. Corp. v. Rogers & Wells, 64 N.Y.2d 904, 905, 488 N.Y.S.2d 156, 477 N.E.2d 458; Stolowitz v. Mount Sinai Hosp., 60 N.Y.2d 685, 686, 468 N.Y.S.2d 460, 455 N.E.2d 1255; Sabatino v. Albany Med. Ctr. Hosp., 187 A.D.2d 777, 778, 589 N.Y.S.2d 654; Cummings v. St. Joseph's Hosp. Health Ctr., 130 A.D.2d 957, 516 N.Y.S.2d 376). Plaintiff's pro se status does not constitute a reasonable excuse for untimely service of the complaint (see, Brooks v. Inn at Saratoga Assn., 88 A.D.2d 921, 591 N.Y.S.2d 625; Yule v. Comerford, 140 A.D.2d 981, 529 N.Y.S.2d 653), and plaintiff in her affidavit failed to establish merit to the action. In a medical malpractice action, "expert medical opinion evidence is required as to matters not within the ordinary experience and knowledge of laypeople" (Adams v. Agrawal, 187 A.D.2d 886, 887, ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Banfi v. American Hosp. for Rehabilitation
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • April 24, 2000
    ...as modified, 457 N.W.2d 188 (Minn. 1990); Kelly v. Berlin, 300 N.J.Super. 256, 692 A.2d 552 (App.Div.1997); Redding v. Saunders, 213 A.D.2d 1015, 625 N.Y.S.2d 115 (1995) (mem.).14But see Hare v. Wendler, 263 Kan. 434, 442, 949 P.2d 1141, 1147 (1997) (noting that common knowledge exception c......
  • Banfi v. Amer. Hospital for Rehab., 26659
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • April 24, 2000
    ...as modified, 457 N.W.2d 188 (Minn. 1990); Kelly v. Berlin, 300 N.J. Super. 256, 692 A.2d 552 (App. Div. 1997); Redding v. Saunders, 213 A.D.2d 1015, 625 N.Y.S.2d 115 (1995) (mem.). 14 But see Hare v. Wendler, 263 Kan. 434, 442, 949 P.2d 1141, 1147 (1997) (noting that common knowledge except......
  • Marcello v. Flecher
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 11, 2017
    ...A.D.2d 653, 653, 665 N.Y.S.2d 978 [1997], lv. denied 91 N.Y.2d 810, 670 N.Y.S.2d 404, 693 N.E.2d 751 [1998] ; Redding v. Saunders, 213 A.D.2d 1015, 1015, 625 N.Y.S.2d 115 [1995], lv. denied 85 N.Y.2d 811, 631 N.Y.S.2d 287, 655 N.E.2d 400 [1995] ) and the alleged failure to diagnose or treat......
  • Percival v. Northwell Health Sys.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 12, 2019
    ...(see Telian v. Freund , 129 A.D.3d 828, 9 N.Y.S.3d 886 ; Culley v. Morrison , 247 A.D.2d 356, 667 N.Y.S.2d 940 ; Redding v. Saunders , 213 A.D.2d 1015, 625 N.Y.S.2d 115 ; Sabatino v. Albany Med. Ctr. Hosp. , 187 A.D.2d 777, 778, 589 N.Y.S.2d 654 ; Brice v. Westchester Community Health Plan ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT