REDM CORPORATION v. Lo Secco
| Citation | 412 F.2d 303 |
| Decision Date | 24 June 1969 |
| Docket Number | No. 618,Docket 33001.,618 |
| Parties | R. E. D. M. CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph LO SECCO, Contracting Officer, Department of the Army, United States Government, Defendant-Appellee. |
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit) |
James V. Joy, Jr., New York City, E. Barrett Prettyman, Jr., Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-appellant.
David Paget, Michael D. Hess, Asst. U. S. Attys., Robert M. Morgenthau, U. S. Atty., for defendant-appellee.
Before WATERMAN, FRIENDLY and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges.
This is an appeal from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York filed on September 27, 1968 (Bonsal, J.), 291 F.Supp. 53, dismissing appellant's mandamus action against appellee, a United States Department of Army Contracting Officer, by which appellant sought to receive additional findings to those filed by the Contracting Officer when he denied appellant's claim for an equitable upward adjustment in appellant's contract price.
We affirm the district court below on the ground that appellant, who had not received a final "de novo" adjudication pursuant to the "Disputes Clause" of its contract, had not exhausted its intra-agency remedies before the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals to which appellant had appealed the Contracting Officer's adverse decision.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Turner v. Baxley
...Petroleum Co., 339 U.S. 667, 70 S.Ct. 876, 94 L.Ed. 1194 (1950); R. E. D. M. Corp. v. Lo Secco, 291 F.Supp. 53 (S.D.N.Y. 1968), aff'd 412 F.2d 303 (1969). Thus the jurisdictional inquiry with respect to Counts IV and V must center on 42 U. S.C. §§ 1985(2), 1985(3) and Section 1986 of Title ......
- Travelers Insurance Company v. Belair, 7243.
-
Tempo Trucking and Transfer Corp. v. Dickson
...409 U.S. 464, 93 S.Ct. 629, 34 L.Ed.2d 647 (1973); R. E. D. M. Corporation v. LoSecco, 291 F. Supp. 53 (S.D.N.Y.1968), aff'd 412 F.2d 303 (2d Cir. 1969); Wells v. United States, 280 F.2d 275 (9th Cir. 1960); Clay v. United States, 93 U.S.App.D.C. 119, 210 F.2d 686 (1953), cert. denied, 347 ......
-
Martin v. Schlesinger, Civ. A. No. 73-G-819-S.
...v. Jones, 131 U.S. 1, 9 S.Ct. 669, 33 L.Ed. 90 (1889); R.E.D.M. Corporation v. Lo Secco, 291 F.Supp. 53 (S.D.N.Y. 1968), aff. 412 F.2d 303 (2nd Cir. 1969). 4 Marine Corps Order P1020.34B (hereinafter "MCO-P1020.34B") Male personnel shall be well groomed at all times. They shall meet the fol......