Reed v. Lukens
| Decision Date | 01 January 1860 |
| Citation | 44 Pa. 200 |
| Parties | Reed versus Lukens. |
| Court | Pennsylvania Supreme Court |
J. M. Broomall, for plaintiff in error.
William Darlington, for defendant in error.
We affirm this judgment for the reasons given by the learned judge below. They fully meet the requirements of the case, and an elaboration of our views on the specifications of error, would be little more than a repetition of what has already been so well said.
Judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
36 cases
-
Liskey v. Snyder
... ... 599; Scarlet v. Hunter, ... 56 N.C. 84; Taylor v. Kelly, 56 N.C. 240; Toft ... v. Stephenson, 1 De G., M. & G. 28; Reed v ... Lukens, 44 Pa. 200, 84 Am.Dec. 425; McKechnie v ... Sterling, 48 Barb. 330; Sutter's Heirs v ... Ling, 25 Pa. 466; McCreight v ... ...
-
Martin v. Baird
... ... Pa. 474; Richter v. Selin, 8 S. & R. 440; ... Vincent v. Huff, 8 S. & R. 381; Siter, James & ... Co.'s App., 26 Pa. 178; Reed v. Lukens, 44 Pa ... 200; Whelen v. Phillips, 151 Pa. 312; Fritz's ... Est., 160 Pa. 156; Kuhns's Est., 163 Pa. 438 ... The ... ...
-
Susan Collins, To Use of J. D. Hill v. London Assurance Corporation
... ... Co. v. Dunham, 117 Pa. 460; Ins. Co ... v. Wilgus, 88 Pa. 107; Chandler v. Ins. Co., 88 ... Pa. 223; Elliott v. Ins. Co., 117 Pa. 548; Reed ... v. Lukens, 44 Pa. 200; Siter, James & Co.'s Ap., 26 ... Pa. 180; Dailey v. Ins. Co., 131 Mass. 173; Hagaman ... v. Ins. Co., 38 Leg. Int. 375 ... ...
-
Cheatham v. CARTER COUNTY TENNESSEE
...L.Ed. 113; Benjamin v. Dinwiddie, 226 Ky. 106, 10 S.W.2d 620; Sewell v. Underhill, 197 N.Y. 168, 90 N.E. 430, 27 L.R.A., N.S., 233; Reed v. Lukens, 44 Pa. 200. The plaintiffs definitely have an interest in the land which is the subject of the condemnation action and, in view of the disclaim......
Request a trial to view additional results