Reed v. Northwestern Pub. Co.
Decision Date | 20 October 1988 |
Docket Number | No. 65876,65876 |
Citation | 125 Ill.Dec. 316,530 N.E.2d 474,124 Ill.2d 495 |
Parties | , 125 Ill.Dec. 316, 15 Media L. Rep. 2233 Michael REED, Appellant, v. NORTHWESTERN PUBLISHING COMPANY, d/b/a The Commercial News, et al., Appellees. |
Court | Illinois Supreme Court |
Richard B. Opsahl, A Professional Corp., Rantoul, for appellant.
Acton, Meyer, Smith & Miller, Danville, Thomas B. Meyer, of Counsel, and Nixon, Hargrave, Devans & Doyle, Rochester, N.Y., William S. Brandt, of Counsel, for appellees.
In the circuit court of Vermilion County, plaintiff, a Danville police officer, filed this libel action against the Northwestern Publishing Company, doing business as The Commercial News (CN), and two of its reporters, Bob Wilson and Carl Young. Wilson and Young were authors of certain allegedly defamatory material concerning plaintiff appearing in CN. The circuit court initially granted defendants' motion for summary judgment, but this ruling was reversed on appeal (Reed v. Northwestern Publishing Co. (1984), 129 Ill.App.3d 133, 84 Ill.Dec. 305, 471 N.E.2d 1071), and trial was held. At the close of plaintiff's case, a judgment was directed in favor of Carl Young, and subsequently the jury found in favor of defendants CN and Bob Wilson.
Plaintiff appealed, raising substantially the same issues presented here, and the appellate court upheld the verdicts (159 Ill.App.3d 699, 111 Ill.Dec. 439, 512 N.E.2d 828). Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 315 (107 Ill.2d R. 315), we granted plaintiff's petition for leave to appeal.
We shall briefly summarize the investigations of a police burglary ring which gave rise to the grand jury report and the newspaper articles involved in this action. We shall then summarize pertinent portions of the grand jury report and the newspaper articles. Next we shall analyze whether plaintiff is a "public official" for first amendment purposes. Then we shall discuss the evidence supporting the verdicts and address numerous alleged trial errors.
During 1970 and 1971 there were (according to testimony of Randy Kirk, city editor of CN) suspicions and rumors afloat that some police officers in the Danville area were involved in burglaries. An internal investigation was conducted at that time through the Danville police department and the Vermilion County State's Attorney's office. However, investigators concluded at that point that insufficient evidence existed to bring charges against any officers. Some years later, in approximately 1975, CN reporters received (from undisclosed sources) some information regarding particular officers involved in some particular burglaries. CN reporters provided this information to the Vermilion County State's Attorney's office. With this information the State's Attorney's office launched a renewed investigation, which eventually led to an investigation by the grand jury.
The grand jury first met in September 1977 to investigate the alleged burglary ring. CN staff writers Les Smith and Dan Olmstead reported the fact of this meeting in CN's September 8, 1978, edition (an article not directly in issue here), stating that the grand jury probe related to suspicions that "as many as seven former or present Danville police officers" may have been involved in burglaries.
The grand jury meetings occurred numerous times, concluding in 1978. Several officers who were alleged to have been involved in some of the burglaries were granted immunity from prosecution in return for their grand jury testimony. Other current and former officers were also called to testify.
At the conclusion of its investigation, the grand jury submitted to Vermilion County Circuit Judge James Robinson a seven-page report (drafted by then-Assistant State's Attorney Craig DeArmond). The grand jury requested that the report be made public, and the report was released on December 20, 1978.
According to the grand jury report, 34 unsolved burglaries were committed in Danville in 1970 and 1971. The report noted that during 1970 and 1971 a series of suspicious burglaries attracted the attention of several ranking officers, and that during this time 37 burglaries were reported, of which only three were solved or cleared by arrest. The remaining 34 burglaries, according to the report, were all discovered by one of four officers, each of whom was either on patrol duty during a night shift or was voluntarily accompanying his colleagues on such patrol. The burglaries all occurred at night, and the targets were all commercial establishments. The report listed 14 particular burglaries for which the grand jury had received evidence.
The grand jury report refers to plaintiff twice. The first reference is in a summary of the testimony of Officer Joseph Miller, who at all relevant times worked for the Danville police department. Miller had participated in an internal investigation of the suspected misconduct, and the grand jury report summarizes his testimony regarding a burglary of the local American Legion Hall as follows:
The grand jury report also refers to plaintiff in summarizing the testimony of Lieutenant Edwin McGee, who, like Miller, had participated in the police department's internal investigation. The grand jury report states:
The report states that a grand jury investigation should have been conducted years earlier. The report states that the limitations period had run regarding the burglary offenses and that officers could thus not be prosecuted for their participation in the offenses. The report concludes that there "is no indication that the situation as it existed in 1970 and 1971 exists today."
On December 21, 1978, the day following the release of the grand jury report, CN published four articles relating to the burglary ring, two of which articles appeared on the front page and are directly in issue here as being allegedly libelous. One such allegedly libelous article (under Bob Wilson's by-line) is entitled, "Grand Jury Describes Police Burglary Setup." It contains pictures of plaintiff and several other officers above the caption, "Current Officers Implicated in Report." Beneath the caption is the statement, "Four current law officers--Arnold Yanders, Robert Testa, Michael Reed and Kenneth Cox--were named by grand jury witnesses as joining in at least one or a few of the reported break-ins by policemen." The article itself states that the grand jury's investigation "determined that up to 10 police officers were involved in the break-ins." The article also states, "The 'usual practice', according to the grand jury testimony of a former policeman identified as one of the ringleaders, was to split whatever was taken among the patrolmen on the scene." The article also states that certain officers had admitted involvement in certain burglaries, and the article further states, Later the article states, "Lieutenant Edwin McGee also testified about the Harding's incident, saying he came on the scene and found Hill, Roland, Massey and Officer Mike Reed inside but without their flashlights turned on."
The other December 21 article (containing no by-line but admittedly contributed to by Carl Young) is entitled, "3 Deny Roles in Burglaries," refers to Reed as one of the officers "implicated" and quotes him as denying any involvement.
On December 22 a follow-up article by Bob Wilson was published, again mentioning plaintiff as one of the officers "implicated." This article focuses on the possibility of criminal or disciplinary charges against the officers and is entitled, "Next Move Weighed in Burglary Ring Case." Plaintiff did not base any cause of action on this article but apparently introduced it as evidence that in publishing other articles Wilson and CN acted with malice.
A December 23, 1978, allegedly libelous article by Bob Wilson also discusses the possible action against the officers and again lists Mike Reed as one of the current officers "named as participants in one or more incidents."
On March 6, 1979, CN published another allegedly libelous article written by then-staff writer Carl Young. This article is entitled, "Policemen Face Choice: Take Lie Detector Tests or be Fired." The article does not mention particular officers by name but states that "the grand jury * * * reported that up to 10 police officers * * * were involved in break-ins at local service stations and stores in 1970-71." The article goes on to state that "the report said 3 of the officers were still on the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Henry v. Media Gen. Operations, Inc.
...1971) (police sergeant); Smith v. Russell , 456 So.2d 462, 463-64 (Fla. 1984) (police officer); Reed v. Northwestern Publishing Co. , 124 Ill.2d 495, 125 Ill.Dec. 316, 530 N.E.2d 474, 480 (1988) (police officer); Rawlins v. Hutchinson Publishing Co. , 218 Kan. 295, 543 P.2d 988, 992 (1975) ......
-
Hailey v. KTBS, Inc.
...S.E.2d 505 (1986); a patrolman performing ordinary and customary duties of a beat police officer, Reed v. Northwestern Publishing Co., 124 Ill.2d 495, 125 Ill.Dec. 316, 530 N.E.2d 474 (1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1067, 109 S.Ct. 1344, 103 L.Ed.2d 813 (1989); a city policeman, Angelo v. Br......
-
Smith v. Danielczyk
...v. City of Cedar Rapids, 308 F.3d 840 (8th Cir.2002); Smith v. Russell, 456 So.2d 462 (Fla.1984); Reed v. Northwestern Pub. Co., 124 Ill.2d 495, 125 Ill.Dec. 316, 530 N.E.2d 474 (1988); Roche v. Egan, 433 A.2d 757 (Me.1981); NAACP v. Moody, 350 So.2d 1365 (Miss.1977); Malerba v. Newsday, 64......
-
Casso v. Brand, C-7246
...237 Cal.Rptr. 359, 361-62 (1987); DiLeo v. Koltnow, 200 Colo. 119, 125, 613 P.2d 318, 323 (1980); Reed v. Northwestern Publishing Co., 124 Ill.2d 495, ----, 530 N.E.2d 474, 481-82 (1988); Bussie v. Lowenthal, 535 So.2d 378, 380 n. 2 (La.1988); Hudak v. Fox, 215 N.J.Super. 233, 238-39, 521 A......