Rees v. Com.
Decision Date | 08 October 1962 |
Docket Number | No. 5438-R,5438-R |
Citation | 127 S.E.2d 406,203 Va. 850 |
Court | Virginia Supreme Court |
Parties | MELVIN DAVIS REES, JR. v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. Record |
T. Stokeley Coleman, Commonwealth's Attorney, for the Commonwealth.
Melvin Davis Rees, Jr., was found guilty by a jury of murder in the first degree for the slaying of Carroll Vernon Jackson, Jr., and his punishment fixed at death. His motion to set aside the verdict was overruled and judgment was entered on the verdict. To that judgment he seeks a writ of error upon the following assignments:
(1) The refusal of the court to order the transfer of the defendant from the State Penitentiary to the city jail in Fredericksburg, Virginia, so that he might be near his court-appointed attorneys.
(2) The refusal of the court to order a change of venue or change of venire, especially in view of the difficulty in obtaining a panel and of the fact that the jury deliberated less than an hour in arriving at a death sentence.
(3) The court erroneously admitted in evidence the .38 caliber pistol which was taken by unlawful search and seizure.
(4) The refusal of the court to sustain the motion to strike the Commonwealth's evidence at the conclusion of the Commonwealth's case and at the conclusion of the whole case;
The refusal of the court to rule that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict; and
The refusal of the court to set aside the verdict as contrary to the law and evidence and award the defendant a new trial.
(5) The court erroneously admitted in evidence the testimony of many witnesses relative to the finding of the two bodies in Maryland.
(6) The court erroneously admitted in evidence the testimony of Thornton Shackelford.
In passing on the defendant's motion for a new trial the lower court, in an exhaustive written opinion, considered the sufficiency of the evidence and the other matters presented in the assignments of error. A careful review of the record convinces us that the judgment of the lower court is plainly right and that the writ prayed for should be denied. The written opinion of the lower court, which is a full and complete answer to the arguments advanced on behalf of the defendant on this appeal, is adopted as the opinion of this court.
'Near Jackson's body were found a pair of plastic gun grips (Com. Ex. 39 and 40), and Jackson's broken eyeglasses (Com. Ex. 41).
'Moser testified that after the bodies of the Jacksons were found, he accused Rees of the crime, and that Rees made no denial and caused his car to collide with another car.
'The Commonwealth introduced evidence that Rees had been seen on December 28, 1958 -- about two weeks before the Jacksons' disappearance -- approximately 29 miles from the place where Jackson's car was found. Phillip Troup testified that on December 27, 1958 Rees played in his orchestra in Alexandria, Virginia. Troup last saw Rees in the company of Pat Weidenhouse about 1:20 a.m., December 28th. Pat Weidenhouse testified on behalf of the defendant, but she made no reference to this incident.
'Rees and Pat Weidenhouse moved to Memphis, Tennessee. There on June 24, 1960 Rees was arrested on a fugitive warrant for a crime not pertinent to this case.
'On June 24, 1960 agents of the F.B.I. searched the home of Mr. and Mrs. Melvin Davis Rees, Sr. In a crawl space in the attic, the agents found an accordion case which contained among other things a.38 caliber Colt Cobra revolver. (Com. Ex. 9)
'The revolver had been sold by Rich's Department Store, Atlanta, Georgia, to William D. Bage. Bage was dissatisfied with the plastic gun grips on the revolver. He purchased a pair of simulated-horn gun grips and fastened them to the revolver. He also purchased a leather holster. In 1957 Bage, advertised the gun for sale in the newspaper and sold it, together with the holster and extra pair of plastic grips, to Rees.
'Allison C. Simms of the F.B.I. laboratories testified that the gun contained minute traces of human blood. He was unable to type this blood or determine how long it had been on the gun. He also found blood on the left gun grip, but was unable to determine whether or not it was human blood.
'George A. Berley of the F.B.I. laboratories examined both the gun, which had been found in the home of the defendant's parents, and the grips, which were found near the body of Jackson. From his examination he concluded that the right grip had at one time been on the gun. He reached this conclusion because of marks or scratches on the interior surface of the grip, which in his opinion could have been caused only by the surface of the metal on the gun butt. He was unable to find identifying marks on the left grip. He also testified that the right grip had defects, which in his opinion could have been caused by force exerted on the grip. This force could have been caused by using the revolver, with the grips attached, to strike a blow. In his opinion the screw attaching the grips to the butt had broken.
'The jury found the defendant guilty of murder in the first degree and fixed his punishment at death. Counsel for the defendant moved to set aside the verdict as contrary to the law and the evidence assigning the following grounds:
Writ of error denied.
1. The refusal of the Court to order the transfer of the defendant from the State Penitentiary to the City Jail in Fredericksburg, Virginia, so that he might be near his court-appointed attorneys.
2. The refusal of the Court to order a change of venue or change of venire, especially in view of the difficulty in obtaining a panel and of the fact that the jury deliberated less than an hour in aarriving at a death sentence.
3. The Court erroneously admitted in evidence the testimony of many witnesses relative to the finding of the two bodies in Maryland.
4. The Court erroneously admitted in evidence the .38 caliber pistol which was taken by unlawful search and seizure.
5. The Court erroneously admitted in evidence the testimony of Thornton Shackelford.
6. The refusal of the Court to sustain the motion to strike the Commonwealth's evidence at the conclusion of the Commonwealth's case and at the conclusion of the whole case.
7. The action of the Court in giving and refusing certain instructions as set forth in detail in the record of the trial.
8. The evidence is insufficient to support the verdict.
9. Certain other and additional grounds which will be more fully set forth when the transcript of the trial is available. (No additional grounds were filed, however.)
'The Court overruled the motion and entered judgment on the verdict.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Chism
...(1934) (One who has no right of ownership or control in premises can't complain of search permitted by owner.)VIRGINIA Rees v. Commonwealth, 203 Va. 850, 127 S.E.2d 406 (1962), cert. den. 372 U.S. 964, 83 S.Ct. 1088, 10 L.Ed.2d 128 (1963) (Parents of defendant could consent to a search and ......
-
Satcher v. Com.
...318, 320, 208 S.E.2d 775, 777 (1974); Bunting v. Commonwealth, 208 Va. 309, 314, 157 S.E.2d 204, 208 (1967); Rees v. Commonwealth, 203 Va. 850, 870, 127 S.E.2d 406, 419 (1962), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 964, 83 S.Ct. 1088, 10 L.Ed.2d 128, reh'g denied,373 U.S. 947, 83 S.Ct. 1533, 10 L.Ed.2d 70......
-
State v. Kinderman
...1081; United States ex rel. McKenna v. Myers (E.D.Pa.) 232 F.Supp. 65; Gray v. Commonwealth, 198 Ky. 610, 249 S.W. 769; Rees v. Commonwealth, 203 Va. 850, 127 S.E.2d 406; Woodard v. United States, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 393, 254 F.2d 312, certiorari denied, 357 U.S. 930, 78 S.Ct. 1375, 2 L.Ed.2d ......
-
Lugar v. Com.
...Va. 506, 508, 158 S.E.2d 755, 758 (1968); Jordan v. Commonwealth, 207 Va. 591, 596, 151 S.E.2d 390, 394 (1966); Rees v. Commonwealth, 203 Va. 850, 864, 127 S.E.2d 406, 416 (1962); Tri-Pharmacy, Inc. v. United States, 203 Va. 723, 729, 127 S.E.2d 89, 93 (1962).3 E.g., Schneckloth v. Bustamon......
-
11.1 Venue and Change of Venue
...Tuggle v. Commonwealth, 228 Va. 493, 323 S.E.2d 539 (1984), vacated on other grounds, 471 U.S. 1096 (1985); Rees v. Commonwealth, 203 Va. 850, 127 S.E.2d 406 (1962).[35] Va. Code § 19.2-251.[36] Cf. Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717, 728 (1961).[37] Briley v. Commonwealth, 221 Va. 532, 273 S.E.2d......
-
5.3 Warrantless Searches
...208 Va. 331, 157 S.E.2d 191 (1967).[251] Ritter v. Commonwealth, 210 Va. 732, 173 S.E.2d 799 (1970); see also Rees v. Commonwealth, 203 Va. 850, 127 S.E.2d 406 (1962).[252] 524 F.2d 167 (4th Cir. 1975).[253] 590 F.2d 535 (4th Cir. 1978).[254] 275 Va. 123, 654 S.E.2d 910 (2008).[255] Goodman......
-
9.14 Venue and Change of Venue
...Tuggle v. Commonwealth, 228 Va. 493, 323 S.E.2d 539 (1984), vacated on other grounds, 471 U.S. 1096 (1985); Rees v. Commonwealth, 203 Va. 850, 127 S.E.2d 406 (1962).[563] Va. Code § 19.2-251.[564] Cf. Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717, 728 (1961).[565] Briley v. Commonwealth, 221 Va. 532, 273 S.E......
-
6.5 Nature of the Privilege
...of privacy violates the privilege.'" Andresen v. Maryland, 427 U.S. 463, 477 (1976).[67] 33 Va. App. 8, 531 S.E.2d 580 (2000).[68] 203 Va. 850, 127 S.E.2d 406 (1962).[69] See Farmer v. Commonwealth, 12 Va. App. 337, 404 S.E.2d 371 (1991). See also ¶ 1.203 of this book.[70] See, e.g., United......