Reese v. State
| Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | MCCULLOCH, J. |
| Citation | Reese v. State, 83 S.W. 918, 73 Ark. 235 (Ark. 1904) |
| Decision Date | 03 December 1904 |
| Parties | REESE v. STATE |
Appeal from Howard Circuit Court, JAMES S. STEEL, Judge.
Affirmed.
W. C Rogers, for appellant.
George W. Murphy, Attorney General, for appellee.
The appellant, Reese, appeals from a judgment of conviction for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor. The case originated before a justice of the peace, where the defendant was convicted, and he appealed to the circuit court. His only defense is a plea of former conviction, which he supports by a record showing tat he was formerly convicted of the same offense and on the same testimony before the mayor of the town of Nashville, as an ex-officio justice of the peace, and appealed to the circuit court, where, on his motion, the cause was dismissed for want of jurisdiction because no affidavit or information had been filed before the mayor. In the former case, the cause was before the circuit court for trial de novo, and...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Watson v. State
...numbered 6, 7 and 10. 77 Ark. 472. Requested instruction numbered 1 should have been especially in view of court's instruction number 1. 73 Ark. 235. The charge of the court does not follow either the indictment or the statute. 72 Ark. 398. The court erred in giving instruction No. 7. J. S.......
-
State ex rel. Thompson v. Parker
...has acquired no rights by prescription. 119 Ark. 383, 379, etc.; 75 N.E. 783; 148 P. 1073. The right to hunt and fish is a property right. 73 Ark. 235; 55 A. 656; 3 Am. 152, etc. To acquire a prescriptive right, there must be an open, definite continuous use, adverse to the owner for seven ......