Reeve v. Long Island Rail Road
| Decision Date | 21 March 2006 |
| Docket Number | 2004-08512. |
| Citation | Reeve v. Long Island Rail Road, 27 AD3d 636, 811 N.Y.S.2d 779, 2006 NY Slip Op 2183 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006) |
| Parties | MARK REEVE, Appellant, v. LONG ISLAND RAIL ROAD et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the defendant Long Island Rail Road.
The plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for personal injuries he sustained on September 13, 2000 when he was struck by a Long Island Rail Road train while lying upon the tracks east of the Riverhead Station in Suffolk County. Before he was struck by the train the plaintiff left a local bar and walked through a parking lot and onto the Long Island Rail Road tracks to take a short cut home. The plaintiff could not recall how he ended up lying upon the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
4 cases
-
Weimar v. Metro. Transp. Auth.
...that the accident was unavoidable (see Mirjah v. New York City Tr. Auth., 48 A.D.3d 764, 765, 853 N.Y.S.2d 148 ; Reeve v. Long Is. R.R., 27 A.D.3d 636, 636, 811 N.Y.S.2d 779 ; Wadhwa v. Long Is. R.R., 13 A.D.3d 615, 615, 788 N.Y.S.2d 148 ). The plaintiff's speculative assertions in oppositi......
-
Neenan v. Quinton
...of the accident as a matter of law ( see Mirjah v. New York City Tr. Auth., 48 A.D.3d 764, 853 N.Y.S.2d 148;Reeve v. Long Is. R.R., 27 A.D.3d 636, 811 N.Y.S.2d 779). Although a plaintiff in a wrongful death action is held to a lower standard of proof than that required of a plaintiff who is......
-
Johnson v. N.Y.C. Transit Auth.
...was unavoidable ( see generally Mirjah v. New York City Tr. Auth., 48 A.D.3d 764, 764–765, 853 N.Y.S.2d 148;Reeve v. Long Is. R.R., 27 A.D.3d 636, 637, 811 N.Y.S.2d 779;Wadhwa v. Long Is. R.R., 13 A.D.3d 615, 615, 788 N.Y.S.2d 148;Rochford v. Long Is. R.R., 291 A.D.2d 439, 439, 737 N.Y.S.2d......
- Reardon v. Carle Place Union Free School District