Reeves v. State
Decision Date | 10 June 2016 |
Docket Number | CR-13-1504. |
Citation | 226 So.3d 711 |
Parties | Matthew REEVES v. STATE of Alabama. |
Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
Alabama Supreme Court 1160053.
Melissa O. Evidente, Lauren Marie Kulpa (withdrew 08/21/2015), Jodi Lopez, and Ariella Thal Simonds, Los Angeles, California; and Jonathan C. Hill and Charles Andrew Stewart III, Montgomery, for appellant.
Luther Strange, atty. gen., and Beth Jackson Hughes, asst. atty. gen., for appellee.
Matthew Reeves appeals the circuit court's denial of his petition for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., in which he attacked his capital-murder conviction and sentence of death.
In 1998, Reeves was convicted of murder made capital because it was committed during the course of a robbery in the first degree, see § 13A–5–40(a)(2), Ala.Code 1975. By a vote of 10–2, the jury recommended that Reeves be sentenced to death for his capital-murder conviction. The trial court followed the jury's recommendation and sentenced Reeves to death. This Court affirmed Reeves's conviction and sentence on appeal. Reeves v. State, 807 So.2d 18 (Ala.Crim.App.2000). The Alabama Supreme Court denied certiorari review, and this Court issued a certificate of judgment on June 8, 2001. The United States Supreme Court subsequently denied certiorari review on November 13, 2001. Reeves v. Alabama, 534 U.S. 1026, 122 S.Ct. 558, 151 L.Ed.2d 433 (2001).
In our opinion affirming Reeves's conviction and sentence, this Court set out the facts of the crime as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
George v. State
...investigation and counsel's decisions regarding the presentation of mitigating evidence were reasonable." Reeves v. State, 226 So.3d 711, 751-52 (Ala. Crim. App. 2016). In Ray v. State, 80 So.3d 965 (Ala. Crim. App. 2011), this Court explained:" ‘ "[F]ailure to investigate possible mitigati......
-
Perkins v. Dunn
...not make the Alabama court's finding with regard to Perkins intellectual functioning "unreasonable." See Ledford, 818 F.3d at 637; Reeves, 226 So. 3d at 739. Also, the Alabama court's failure to account for the SEM does not support a finding that its determination of Perkins's intellectual ......
-
Lockhart v. State
...investigatory efforts, we must first determine the nature and extent of the investigation that took place." Reeves v. State, 226 So. 3d 711, 751 (Ala. Crim. App. 2016) (citations and quotations omitted). Armstrong directed Saunders, an associate in his firm, to coordinate the mitigation inv......
-
Woodward v. State
...that the United States Supreme Court's opinion in Hurst does not apply retroactively on collateral review, see Reeves v. State, 226 So. 3d 711, 756-57 (Ala. Crim. App. 2016), and (2) that neither Hurst nor Ring rendered Alabama's former capital-sentencing scheme, including judicial override......
-
Weekly Case Digests September 7, 2021 September 10, 2021.
...stressing that lack of evidence about counsel's decisions impeded Reeves' efforts to prove that they acted unreasonably. Reeves v. State, 226 So. 3d 711, 750751 On federal habeas review, the Eleventh Circuit held that this analysis was not only wrong, but indefensible. In an unpublished, pe......
-
Habeas Relief Sufficiency of Evidence.
...stressing that lack of evidence about counsel's decisions impeded Reeves' efforts to prove that they acted unreasonably. Reeves v. State, 226 So. 3d 711, 750751 On federal habeas review, the Eleventh Circuit held that this analysis was not only wrong, but indefensible. In an unpublished, pe......