Reeves v. State

Decision Date10 June 2016
Docket NumberCR-13-1504.
Citation226 So.3d 711
Parties Matthew REEVES v. STATE of Alabama.
CourtAlabama Court of Criminal Appeals

Alabama Supreme Court 1160053.

Melissa O. Evidente, Lauren Marie Kulpa (withdrew 08/21/2015), Jodi Lopez, and Ariella Thal Simonds, Los Angeles, California; and Jonathan C. Hill and Charles Andrew Stewart III, Montgomery, for appellant.

Luther Strange, atty. gen., and Beth Jackson Hughes, asst. atty. gen., for appellee.

KELLUM, Judge.

Matthew Reeves appeals the circuit court's denial of his petition for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., in which he attacked his capital-murder conviction and sentence of death.

In 1998, Reeves was convicted of murder made capital because it was committed during the course of a robbery in the first degree, see § 13A–5–40(a)(2), Ala.Code 1975. By a vote of 10–2, the jury recommended that Reeves be sentenced to death for his capital-murder conviction. The trial court followed the jury's recommendation and sentenced Reeves to death. This Court affirmed Reeves's conviction and sentence on appeal. Reeves v. State, 807 So.2d 18 (Ala.Crim.App.2000). The Alabama Supreme Court denied certiorari review, and this Court issued a certificate of judgment on June 8, 2001. The United States Supreme Court subsequently denied certiorari review on November 13, 2001. Reeves v. Alabama, 534 U.S. 1026, 122 S.Ct. 558, 151 L.Ed.2d 433 (2001).

In our opinion affirming Reeves's conviction and sentence, this Court set out the facts of the crime as follows:

"The State's evidence tended to show the following. On November 27, 1996, the appellant (who was 18 years old at the time) and his younger brother, Julius, visited Brenda Suttles and Suttles's 15–year–old cousin, Emanuel, at Suttles's house on Lavender Street in Selma. There, according to Suttles, everyone agreed to go out ‘looking for some robberies.’ (R. 684.) Shortly after noon that day, the foursome left Suttles's house on foot and walked to a nearby McDonald's restaurant, where they saw Jason Powell driving by in his car. The appellant's brother, Julius, flagged Powell down, and Powell agreed to give the group a ride.
"Brenda Suttles and Emanuel Suttles testified that after the foursome got into Powell's car, Julius Reeves suggested that they go to White Hall, a town in neighboring Lowndes County, to rob a drug dealer. According to Brenda Suttles, everyone in the car agreed to the plan. (Powell, who also testified at trial, denied hearing the discussion about a robbery.) Before leaving Selma, the group stopped at an apartment on Broad Street. Julius Reeves went inside the apartment and returned to the car a short time later carrying a shotgun, which he handed to the appellant. With Powell driving, the group then headed for White Hall.
"Before they reached White Hall, however, Powell's car broke down on a dirt road off Highway 80. Shortly thereafter, a passing motorist, Duane Smith, stopped and told the group that he was in a hurry to meet some friends to go hunting, but that he would return around sunset and would take them to get help then. For the next couple of hours, the group sat in Powell's car and listened to music, until another passing motorist, Willie Johnson, stopped in his pickup truck and offered to tow Powell's car to Selma. Using some chains that he kept in his pickup truck, Johnson hooked Powell's car to the back of his truck. With Julius Reeves riding in the truck with him and the others in Powell's car, Johnson towed the car to the Selma residence where the appellant and Julius lived with their mother.
"When they arrived at the Reeveses' house, Julius Reeves got out of Johnson's truck and told the others that Johnson wanted $25 for towing them. However, no one had any money to pay Johnson. Julius Reeves then offered to give Johnson a ring as payment if Johnson would drive him to his girlfriend's house to get the ring. Johnson agreed and he unhooked Powell's car from his truck. According to Jason Powell and Emanuel Suttles, Julius Reeves at this point told the others that Johnson was going to be their robbery victim. While Jason Powell and Emanuel Suttles stayed behind with Powell's car in front of the Reeveses' house, Julius Reeves got back in the cab of the truck with Johnson, and Brenda Suttles climbed into the rear bed of the truck. Testimony indicated that when Johnson started the truck, the appellant jumped into the rear bed of the truck with the shotgun, hiding the weapon behind his leg as he did so.
"When they arrived at Julius's girlfriend's house in Johnson's truck, Julius went inside and retrieved the ring he had promised to give Johnson as payment. According to Brenda Suttles, when Julius came out of the house, he walked to the rear of Johnson's truck and told her and the appellant that he was not going to let Johnson keep the ring. After Julius got back in the cab of the truck, Johnson drove everyone back to the Reeveses' house.
"Jason Powell and Emanuel Suttles, who had remained at the house with Powell's car, testified that sometime around 7:00 p.m., they saw Johnson's truck drive by the house and turn into an alley—known as Crockett's Alley—behind the house. According to Brenda Suttles, who was in the rear bed of the truck with the appellant, just as the truck came to a stop in the alley, she heard a loud ‘pow’ sound. (R. 704.) Suttles testified that when she looked up, the appellant was withdrawing the barrel of the shotgun from the open rear window of the truck's cab. Johnson had been shot in the neck and was slumped over in the driver's seat. Suttles testified that Julius Reeves jumped out of the truck's cab and asked the appellant what he had done, and that the appellant then told Julius and Suttles to go through Johnson's pockets to ‘get his money.’ (R. 704.) Suttles stated that Julius then pulled Johnson out of the truck and went through his pockets, giving the money he found in the pockets to the appellant. After Julius had gone through Johnson's pockets, Suttles helped him put Johnson back in the truck's cab. According to Suttles, Johnson was bleeding heavily and making ‘gagging’ noises. (R. 721.)
"Jason Powell and Emanuel Suttles testified that they heard the gunshot after Johnson's truck pulled into Crockett's Alley and that a short time later they saw the appellant, Julius Reeves, and Brenda Suttles run out of the alley and into the Reeveses' house. The appellant was carrying a shotgun, they said. They followed the appellant, Julius Reeves, and Brenda Suttles into the Reeveses' house and saw the appellant place the shotgun under a bed in his bedroom. The appellant told Julius and Brenda Suttles to change out of their bloodstained clothes and shoes, and he took the clothes and shoes and stuffed them under a dresser in his bedroom. According to Emanuel Suttles, as the appellant, Julius, and Brenda changed their clothes, they were ‘jumping and hollering’ and celebrating about ‘all the stuff [they] got’ from Johnson. (R. 842.) Jason Powell testified that he heard the appellant say, ‘I made the money.’ (R. 786.)
"After changing their clothes, the appellant, Julius Reeves, and Brenda Suttles ran to Suttles's house. On the way, the appellant stopped to talk to his girlfriend, telling her that if she should be questioned by the police, to tell them that he had been with her all day. At Suttles's house, the appellant divided the money taken from Johnson—approximately $360—among himself, Julius Reeves, and Brenda Suttles. Testimony indicated that throughout the evening, the appellant continued to brag about having shot Johnson. Several witnesses who were present at Suttles's house that evening testified that they saw the appellant dancing, ‘throwing up’ gang signs, and pretending to pump a shotgun. Brenda Suttles testified that as the appellant danced, he would jerk his body around in a manner ‘mock[ing] the way that Willie Johnson had died.’ (R. 713.) The appellant was also heard to say that the shooting would earn him a ‘teardrop,’ a gang tattoo acquired for killing someone. (R. 720.)
"Yolanda Blevins, who was present during the post-shooting ‘celebration’ at Suttles's house, testified that the appellant called her into the kitchen and told her that he had shot a man in a truck after catching a ride with him. Blevins noticed that there was what appeared to be dried blood on the appellant's hands. LaTosha Rodgers, who was also present at Suttles's house, testified that the appellant told her that he had ‘just shot somebody’ in the alley. (R. 924.)
"At around 2:00 a.m. on November 28, 1996 (approximately seven hours after the shooting), Selma police received a report of a suspicious vehicle parked in Crockett's Alley. When police officers investigated, they found Johnson's body slumped across the seat of his pickup truck. There was a pool of blood on the ground on the driver's side of the truck. Several coins and a diamond ring were on the ground near the truck. On the floorboard of the truck, police found wadding from a shotgun shell. The pockets of Johnson's pants had been turned inside out and were empty. Testimony at trial indicated that Johnson was a longtime employee of the Selma Housing Authority and that on the afternoon of November 27, 1996, he had cashed his paycheck, which had been in the amount of $500.
"At the shooting scene on the morning of November 28, police also discovered a trail of blood leading from Johnson's truck to the Reeveses' house. Randy Tucker, a canine-patrol officer with the Selma Police Department, testified that his dog tracked the blood trail from the pool of blood next to Johnson's truck, down Crockett's Alley, through the yard at 2126 Selma Avenue (the residence next to the alley), and ultimately to the front steps of the Reeveses' house at 2128 Selma Avenue.
"Pat Grindle, the detective in charge of investigating Johnson's murder, went to the Reeveses' house after learning that the blood
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
41 cases
  • George v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • January 11, 2019
    ...investigation and counsel's decisions regarding the presentation of mitigating evidence were reasonable." Reeves v. State, 226 So.3d 711, 751-52 (Ala. Crim. App. 2016). In Ray v. State, 80 So.3d 965 (Ala. Crim. App. 2011), this Court explained:" ‘ "[F]ailure to investigate possible mitigati......
  • Perkins v. Dunn
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Alabama
    • September 19, 2019
    ...not make the Alabama court's finding with regard to Perkins intellectual functioning "unreasonable." See Ledford, 818 F.3d at 637; Reeves, 226 So. 3d at 739. Also, the Alabama court's failure to account for the SEM does not support a finding that its determination of Perkins's intellectual ......
  • Lockhart v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • April 23, 2021
    ...investigatory efforts, we must first determine the nature and extent of the investigation that took place." Reeves v. State, 226 So. 3d 711, 751 (Ala. Crim. App. 2016) (citations and quotations omitted). Armstrong directed Saunders, an associate in his firm, to coordinate the mitigation inv......
  • Woodward v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • April 27, 2018
    ...that the United States Supreme Court's opinion in Hurst does not apply retroactively on collateral review, see Reeves v. State, 226 So. 3d 711, 756-57 (Ala. Crim. App. 2016), and (2) that neither Hurst nor Ring rendered Alabama's former capital-sentencing scheme, including judicial override......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Weekly Case Digests September 7, 2021 September 10, 2021.
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Law Journal No. 2021, March 2021
    • September 10, 2021
    ...stressing that lack of evidence about counsel's decisions impeded Reeves' efforts to prove that they acted unreasonably. Reeves v. State, 226 So. 3d 711, 750751 On federal habeas review, the Eleventh Circuit held that this analysis was not only wrong, but indefensible. In an unpublished, pe......
  • Habeas Relief Sufficiency of Evidence.
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Law Journal No. 2021, March 2021
    • September 9, 2021
    ...stressing that lack of evidence about counsel's decisions impeded Reeves' efforts to prove that they acted unreasonably. Reeves v. State, 226 So. 3d 711, 750751 On federal habeas review, the Eleventh Circuit held that this analysis was not only wrong, but indefensible. In an unpublished, pe......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT