E. Regensburg & Sons v. Juan F. Portuondo Cigar Mfg. Co.
Decision Date | 29 December 1905 |
Docket Number | 15. |
Citation | 142 F. 160 |
Parties | E. REGENSBURG & SONS v. JUAN F. PORTUONDO CIGAR MFG. CO. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit |
The material facts in this case are sufficiently set forth in the opinion of the learned judge of the court below, in which we concur, and which we quote in full as follows:
J. B McPHERSON, District Judge. The complainant, a New York corporation, engaged in the manufacture and sale of cigars seeks to restrain the defendant from using a certain kind of band around its cigars, on several grounds:
1. Because the defendant's band infringes the complainant's patent for a similar device.
2. Because the defendant's band infringes the complainant's trade-mark, namely, the same band for which the patent was taken out.
3. Because, in view of the prior use of the complainant's band the defendant is guilty of unfair competition by the use of its own device.
Both bands are dark brown, differing very little from the color of a cigar wrapper, and the lettering upon both is white. The following figure shows the complainant's band:
(Image Omitted)
And the defendant's band, which differs in shape and lettering is shown upon the following reproduction:
(Image Omitted)
1. The complainant is now the owner, by assignment, of patent No. 715,512, granted to M. Regensburg on December 9, 1902, upon an application filed on March 19th of that year. The subject of the invention is an improvement in 'cigar bands made of paper or like material, one end of which is provided with an adhesive substance, so as to adapt it to be pasted upon the other end of the band. ' The object of the invention is stated to be 'to provide an improved cigar band of the above-indicated class, which will be so constructed as to protect the cigar wrapper from contact with the adhesive portion of the band, and to materially reduce the time and labor necessary for applying the band to a cigar. ' The specification describes the band in the following language, and recounts the advantages that may be expected therefrom:
The claim is as follows:
'As a new article of manufacture a laterally flexible paper cigar band one end of which is broader than its body and than the other end, the narrow end carrying adhesive substance on its inner side, so that it may overlap the broad end and be secured thereto, the broad end allowing the adhesion with the narrow end within a considerable radius and furnishing projections extending laterally for detaching...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Pacific Coast Condensed Milk Co. v. Frye & Co.
... ... Enoch Morgan's Sons Co. v. Whittier-Coburn Co. (C ... C.) 118 ... Kirk (C. C.) 40 F. 589; ... Regensburg & Sons v. Juan F. Portuondo Cigar Mfg ... ...
-
In re Walker-Gordon Laboratory Co.
...ever intended that such a result should be accomplished through the trade-mark registration statute. E. Regensburg & Sons v. Juan F. Portuondo Cigar Mfg. Co. (C. C. A.) 142 F. 160; In re Onedia Community, 41 App. D. C. 260; Sawyer v. Horn (C. C.) 1 F. 24; Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Rober......
-
Newcomer & Lewis v. Scriven Co.
... ... 727, 74 C.C.A. 59; ... Regensburg v. Portuondo Cigar Mfg. Company, 142 F ... 160, ... 378; ... [168 F. 624] ... Leschen Sons' Rope Company v. Broderick & Bascom Rope ... ...