Regents of University of California, In re, No. 471

CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Writing for the CourtBefore NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, SKELTON, Senior Circuit Judge, and LOURIE; PAULINE NEWMAN
Citation101 F.3d 1386,40 USPQ2d 1784
Parties, 36 Fed.R.Serv.3d 641, 114 Ed. Law Rep. 780, 40 U.S.P.Q.2d 1784 In re the REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Petitioner. Miscellaneous
Docket NumberNo. 471
Decision Date14 November 1996
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
118 practice notes
  • AMBAC Assurance Corp. v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals
    • June 9, 2016
    ...493 F.3d at 364 ; United States v. BDO Seidman, LLP, 492 F.3d 806, 816 [7th Cir.2007] ; 27 N.Y.3d 632 In re Regents of Univ. of Cal., 101 F.3d 1386, 1390–1391 [Fed.Cir.1996] ).5 Like Proposed Rule 503(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Evidence—which was proposed in 1972 but never adopted—they a......
  • In re Seagate Technology, LLC, Misc. No. 830.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • August 20, 2007
    ...cases, a writ of mandamus may issue "to prevent the wrongful exposure of privileged communications." In re Regents of the Univ. of Cal., 101 F.3d 1386, 1387 (Fed.Cir.1996). Specifically, "mandamus review may be granted of discovery orders that turn on claims of privilege when (1) there is r......
  • Ambac Assurance Corp. v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals
    • June 9, 2016
    ...493 F.3d at 364 ; United States v. BDO Seidman, LLP, 492 F.3d 806, 816 [7th Cir.2007] ; 27 N.Y.3d 632 In re Regents of Univ. of Cal., 101 F.3d 1386, 1390–1391 [Fed.Cir.1996] ).5 Like Proposed Rule 503(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Evidence—which was proposed in 1972 but never adopted—they a......
  • In re Lott, No. 05-3532.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit)
    • September 9, 2005
    ...privilege); Hahnemann University Hospital v. Edgar, 74 F.3d 456, 461 (3d Cir.1996); see also In re Regents of University of California, 101 F.3d 1386, 1387 (Fed.Cir.1996), cert. denied 520 U.S. 1193, 117 S.Ct. 1484, 137 L.Ed.2d 695 (issuing mandamus to set aside discovery order where distri......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
117 cases
  • U.S. v. Bdo Seidman, Llp, No. 05-3260.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • July 2, 2007
    ...in order to meet legal requirements and to plan their conduct" accordingly. See In re Regents of the Univ. of California, 101 F.3d 1386, 1390-91 (Fed.Cir.1996). This planning serves the public interest by advancing compliance with the law, "facilitating the administration of justi......
  • In re Lott, No. 05-3532.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit)
    • September 9, 2005
    ...privilege); Hahnemann University Hospital v. Edgar, 74 F.3d 456, 461 (3d Cir.1996); see also In re Regents of University of California, 101 F.3d 1386, 1387 (Fed.Cir.1996), cert. denied 520 U.S. 1193, 117 S.Ct. 1484, 137 L.Ed.2d 695 (issuing mandamus to set aside discovery order where distri......
  • U.S. ex rel. Pogue v. Diabetes Treatment, No. 04-6130.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit)
    • April 11, 2006
    ...added); ... Hahnemann University Hospital v. Edgar, 74 F.3d 456, 461 (3d Cir.1996); see also In re Regents of University of California, 101 F.3d 1386, 1387 (Fed.Cir. 1996), cert. denied 520 U.S. 1193, 117 S.Ct. 1484, 137 L.Ed.2d 695 (issuing mandamus to set aside discovery order where distr......
  • AMBAC Assurance Corp. v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals
    • June 9, 2016
    ...493 F.3d at 364 ; United States v. BDO Seidman, LLP, 492 F.3d 806, 816 [7th Cir.2007] ; 27 N.Y.3d 632 In re Regents of Univ. of Cal., 101 F.3d 1386, 1390–1391 [Fed.Cir.1996] ).5 Like Proposed Rule 503(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Evidence—which was proposed in 1972 but never adopted—they a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • Third Party Funding'Impact On Privilege In Litigation And International Arbitration
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • October 25, 2021
    ...p.7 (Del. Super., 12 February 2009) (citing Re Teleglobe 493 F.3d 345, 365 (3d Cir. 2007) and Re Regents of the University of California 101 F.3d 1386, 1390 (9th Cir. 1996) for the "substantially similar legal interest 12. Re International Oil Trading Co 548 B.R. 825, 832-833 (Bankr. S.D. F......
  • Third Party Funding'Impact On Privilege In Litigation And International Arbitration
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • October 25, 2021
    ...p.7 (Del. Super., 12 February 2009) (citing Re Teleglobe 493 F.3d 345, 365 (3d Cir. 2007) and Re Regents of the University of California 101 F.3d 1386, 1390 (9th Cir. 1996) for the "substantially similar legal interest 12. Re International Oil Trading Co 548 B.R. 825, 832-833 (Bankr. S.D. F......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT