Rehaif v. United States, 17–9560.
| Decision Date | 11 January 2019 |
| Docket Number | No. 17–9560.,17–9560. |
| Citation | 139 S.Ct. 914 (Mem),202 L.Ed.2d 641 |
| Parties | Hamid Mohamed Ahmed Ali REHAIF, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
159 cases
-
Cureton v. United States
...Cureton's last set of arguments pertain to the alleged failure to preserve certain legal arguments, including arguments under Rehaif, 202 L.Ed.2d 641, Fed. R. Crim. P. 7, Mathis v. United States, 579 U.S. 500 (2016), Johnson v. United States, 576 U.S. 591 (2015), and Davis, 204 L.Ed.2d 757.......
-
United States v. Carnell
...a culpable mental state regarding ‘each of the statutory elements that criminalize otherwise innocent conduct.'” Rehaif v. United States, 139 S.Ct. 2191, 2195 (2019) (citations omitted). This “presumption in favor scienter . . . applies with equal or greater force when Congress includes a g......
-
United States v. Strukov
...Id. The defendant challenged the sufficiency of the indictment and the jury instructions postconviction, citing Rehaif v. United States, 139 S.Ct. 2191 (2019), which the Supreme Court held that, to prove a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), the government “must show that the defendant knew he......
-
Adams v. United States
...1. “Unlawful conviction of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) in Counts 13, 14, 25, and 26” in light of Rehaif v. United States, 139 S.Ct. 2191 (2019) (id. PagelD 3; see also id. at PagelD 3-4, 8-12, 17-22); 2. “Unlawful conviction of violating 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) in Count 4” in light of Sessions v. Dima......
Get Started for Free