Rehberg v. Paulk
| Docket Number | 10-788 |
| Decision Date | 02 April 2012 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
799 cases
-
Stillwagon v. City of Del.
...that a grand jury witness has absolute immunity from any § 1983 claim based on the witness's testimony. Rehberg v. Paulk , 566 U.S. 356, 369, 132 S.Ct. 1497, 182 L.Ed.2d 593 (2012).20 The immunity, the Court explained, could "not be circumvented by claiming that a grand jury witness conspir......
-
United States v. Thorne
...so much so that the [Supreme] Court has referred to its confidentiality as ‘vital.’ " (quoting Rehberg v. Paulk , 566 U.S. 356, 374, 132 S.Ct. 1497, 182 L.Ed.2d 593 (2012) )). The totality of these sources informed the Circuit's decision that the text of Rule 6(e) must be interpreted narrow......
-
Marshall v. Marshall
...absolute immunity from any § 1983 claim based on the witness’ testimony. (R. Marshall's Mem. at 15 (citing Rehberg v. Paulk , 566 U.S. 356, 132 S.Ct. 1497, 182 L.Ed.2d 593 (2012) ).) However, Robert Marshall does not fall within the protections of this principle, as he constitutes a "compla......
-
Laskar v. Hurd, No. 19-11719
... ... Because section 1983 is not merely "a federalized amalgamation of pre-existing common-law claims," Rehberg , 566 U.S. at 366, 132 S.Ct. 1497, we must determine whether this common-law understanding comports with relevant constitutional principles, ... ...
Get Started for Free
8 books & journal articles
-
THE BRANCH BEST QUALIFIED TO ABOLISH IMMUNITY.
...409, 419-20, 420 n.25 (1968) (disavowing characterization of the law in Hurd v. Hodge, 334 U.S. 24, 31 (1948)). (66) Rehberg v. Paulk, 566 U.S. 356, 364-65 (67) See Jack M. Beermann, A Critical Approach to Section 1983 with Special Attention to Sources of Law, 42 STAN. L. REV. 51, 57 (1989)......
-
Qualified and Absolute Immunity at Common Law.
...thus recognized that sources after 1871 might be relevant in identifying the principles of the common law in 1871. See Rehberg v. Paulk, 566 U.S. 356, 365-66 (29.) Bogan, 523 U.S. at 51. (30.) Stephen A. Siegel, Joel Bishop's Orthodoxy, 13 LAW & HIST. REV. 215, 215 (1995) (quoting Mr. B......
-
THE CASE AGAINST QUALIFIED IMMUNITY.
...(5) Ziglar v. Abbasi, 137 S. Ct. 1843, 1871 (2017) (Thomas, J., concurring) (alteration in original) (quoting Rehberg v. Paulk, 566 U.S. 356, 363 (6) Id. at 1872. (7) See, e.g., Will Baude, "In an Appropriate Case, We Should Reconsider Our Qualified Immunity Jurisprudence," WASH. POST: THE ......
-
Qualified Immunity and Federalism All the Way Down
...Act against the United States, which are paid from the U.S. Treasury’s Judgment Fund). 237. See supra Part III. 238. Rehberg v. Paulk, 566 U.S. 356, 363 (2012) (quoting Malley v. Briggs, 475 U.S. 335, 342 (1986)). 239. See Richardson v. McKnight, 521 U.S. 399, 401 (1997); Wyatt v. Cole, 504......
Get Started for Free