Rehberg v. Paulk
| Decision Date | 11 October 2011 |
| Docket Number | No. 10–788.,10–788. |
| Citation | 565 U.S. 940,181 L.Ed.2d 254,132 S.Ct. 445 (Mem) |
| Parties | Charles A. REHBERG, petitioner, v. James P. PAULK, et al. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
9 cases
-
Langston v. Milton S. Hershey Med. Ctr., CIVIL NO. 1:15-CV-02027
...deprived the plaintiff of rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the laws or the Constitution of the United States. Rehberg v. Paulk, 132 S.Ct. 1497, 1501 (2012); Barkes v. First Corr. Med., Inc., 766 F.3d 307, 316 (3d Cir. 2014).Bookwalter v. Keen, No. 1:15-CV-1291, 2015 WL 6157191, ......
-
Tedesco v. Peak, Civil Action No. 18-cv-02008-PAB-KLM
...sued pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 "has absolute immunity with respect to any claim based on the witness' testimony." Rehberg v. Paulk, 566 U.S. 356, 367 (2012) (citing Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325, 332-33 (1983)). Thus, Peak's and Herman's statements at trial cannot be a foundation for Te......
-
Lewis v. Strickland, C/A No. 2:15-1241-TMC-MGB
...tovindicate violations of 'rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws' of the United States." Rehberg v. Paulk, 132 S. Ct. 1497, 1501 (2012). To state a claim under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege two essential elements: (1) that a right secured by the Constituti......
-
Prior v. South Carolina, C/A No. 6:19-1619-TMC-KFM
...to vindicate violations of 'rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws' of the United States." Rehberg v. Paulk, 566 U.S. 356, 361 (2012). To state a claim under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege two essential elements: (1) that a right secured by the Constitution ......
Request a trial to view additional results