Reich v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Citation251 S.W. 1072
Docket Number(No. 7277.)
PartiesREICH v. STATE.
Decision Date30 May 1923

Appeal from District Court, Wood County; J. R. Warren, Judge.

Bob Reich was convicted of unlawfully manufacturing intoxicating liquor, and he appeals. Reversed.

Jones & Jones, of Mineola, for appellant.

R. G. Storey, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

MORROW, P. J.

Conviction is for the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of three years.

The indictment contained no averments to the effect that the intoxicating liquor was not manufactured for one of the purposes permitted by the Constitution and statutes. It was filed in March, 1922. The date of the offense was laid on the 10th of November, 1921, and "anterior to the presentment of the indictment." The attack on it because of the absence of the negative averments is deemed unsound. Such averments were required in offenses committed prior to November 15, 1921, at which time the statute was amended. The present indictment would have limited the proof to an offense committed subsequent to that date and prior to the filing of the indictment, but would not have vitiated it. See Plachy v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 239 S. W. 979.

The so-called Dean Law (Vernon's Ann. Pen. Code Supp. 1922, art. 588¼ et seq.) is not void by its alleged conflict with similar laws enacted by Congress. Ex parte Gilmore, 88 Tex. Cr. R. 529, 228 S. W. 199.

After excusing the jurors who were disqualified, there remained 22 in the panel. The trial court committed no error in refusing to fill the panel preliminary to the exercising of peremptory challenges. See Speiden v. State, 3 Tex. App. 156, 30 Am. Rep. 126; Logan v. State, 55 Tex. Cr. R. 180, 115 S. W. 1192; West v. State, 7 Tex. App. 150; also Riley v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 249 S. W. 1066.

Preliminary to the trial, appellant told the court that a number of the veniremen were believed by appellant's counsel to be members of a secret organization known as the Ku Klux Klan; that, according to his information, many criminal cases pending in Wood county had been discussed by the members of that organization and speeches had been made in their lodge rooms insisting upon convictions in criminal cases, and that, for the reasons stated, he feared that prejudice had been created against him and against his case, and on that account he requested the court to permit him to inquire of the jurors on their voir dire whether or not they were members of the organization mentioned. The court refused this request, to which action appellant took exception, and now presents the matter for review. Ten peremptory challenges are allowed the accused in felony cases less than capital. In article 690 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, it is said:

"A peremptory challenge is made to a juror without assigning any reason therefor."

Under the practice in this state, the right to interrogate veniremen on their voir dire is not open to question. This may be done in order to elicit facts that will enable them to exercise their right of peremptory challenge in an intelligent manner. This must, of course, within reasonable limits, be determined under the facts of the particular case by the trial judge. His discretion in the matter however, has limitations, and, when abused, will be corrected upon appeal. Cyc. vol. 24, p. 338, 3d subdivisi...

To continue reading

Request your trial
35 cases
  • Bigby v. State, 71234
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
    • November 2, 1994
    ...to glean information enabling them more intelligently to exercise their respective peremptory challenges. See, e.g., Reich v. State, 94 Tex.Cr.R. 449, 251 S.W. 1072 (1923), citing civil and criminal cases; Belcher v. State, 96 Tex.Cr.R. 561, 258 S.W. 815 (1924); Kincaid v. State, 103 Tex.Cr......
  • Wise v. City of Abilene, 2017.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas
    • May 17, 1940
    ...Tex. Cr.R. 501, 60 S.W. 968; Garcia v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 63 S.W. 309; Ross v. State, 53 Tex.Cr.R. 162, 109 S.W. 153; Reich v. State, 94 Tex.Cr.R. 449, 251 S.W. 1072; Plair v. State, 102 Tex.Cr.R. 628, 279 S.W. 267; Darnaby v. State, 108 Tex.Cr.R. 408, 1 S.W.2d 615; Missouri, K. & T. Ry. C......
  • Maddux v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
    • June 9, 1993
    ...Klux Klan and sought to question the panel on whether anyone was a member, but not for the purpose of revealing race bias. 94 Tex.Crim. 449, 251 S.W. 1072, 1073 (1923). The attorney explained to the trial court "that, according to his information, many of the criminal cases pending in Wood ......
  • Smith v. State, 47763
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
    • September 18, 1974
    ...counsel. DeLaRosa v. State, 414 S.W.2d 668 (Tex.Cr.App.1967); Plair v. State, 102 Tex.Cr.R. 628, 279 S.W. 267 (1926); Reich v. State, 94 Tex.Cr.R. 449, 251 S.W. 1072 (1923); Meador v. State, 'As a general rule great latitude should be allowed a party interrogating a venire in order to enabl......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT