Reisgo v. United States

Decision Date16 January 1923
Docket Number3909.
Citation285 F. 740
PartiesREISGO v. UNITED STATES.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

W. K Zewadski, Jr., of Tampa, Fla., for plaintiff in error.

Wm. M Gober, U.S. Atty., Maynard Ramsey, Asst. U.S. Atty., and Harry W. Reinstine, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., all of Jacksonville, Fla.

Before WALKER, BRYAN, and KING, Circuit Judges.

WALKER Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff in error (herein called the defendant) was convicted, under an information charging that he did unlawfully and knowingly have in his possession described intoxicating liquor, and brings the case here by writ of error.

In connection with testimony as to the searching of the defendant's premises, a search warrant was offered in evidence. The defendant objected to the introduction of that instrument in evidence 'because the same does not show a proper return on the back, it not having been sworn to. ' The overruling of that objection was not error. The admissibility of the warrant was not dependent on the return being sworn to. The objection as made was not based on the ground that there was a failure to comply with the provision of the statute (Comp St. 1918, Sec. 10496 1/4m), as to the delivery to the official who issued such warrant of a sworn written inventory of property taken in executing it. It seems that, if the objection had been made on that ground, it would not have been well taken, as the making and delivery of the inventory called for is a...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • United States v. Hubbard
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • September 13, 1979
    ...even to complete an inventory is merely a ministerial violation which does not affect the validity of the search. Reisgo v. United States, 285 F. 740, 741 (5th Cir. 1923). See Nordelli v. United States, 24 F.2d 665, 667 (9th Cir. 1928); United States v. Hooper, 320 F.Supp. 507, 509-10 (E.D.......
  • United States v. Wilson
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • October 29, 1971
    ...is ministerial and does not affect the validity of the search. United States v. Haskins, 345 F.2d 111 (6th Cir. 1965); Reisgo v. United States, 285 F. 740 (5th Cir. 1923). VIII. Illegal Search of Hatcher was arrested with a warrant and subjected to a search. The search produced names of two......
  • United States v. Zager
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Maryland
    • March 13, 1936
    ...(C.C.A.6), certiorari denied 257 U.S. 655, 42 S.Ct. 97, 66 L.Ed. 419; United States v. Kaplan (D.C.Ga.) 286 F. 963, 971; Reisgo v. United States, 285 F. 740 (C.C.A.5). See, also, Benton v. United States (C.C.A.) 70 F.(2d) 24, 26. Contra, Giles v. United States, 284 F. 208 (C.C.A.1); Murby v......
  • United States v. Romano
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Connecticut
    • March 9, 1962
    ...cert. denied, 353 U.S. 976, 77 S.Ct. 1059, 1 L.Ed.2d 1137 (1957); Nordelli v. United States, 24 F.2d 665 (9 Cir. 1928); Reisgo v. United States, 285 F. 740 (5 Cir. 1923); United States v. Greene, 141 F.Supp. 856 (D.D.C.1956); United States v. Gross, 137 F.Supp. 244 ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT