Reiss v. Reiss
| Decision Date | 08 February 2001 |
| Citation | 719 N.Y.S.2d 861,280 A.D.2d 315 |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
| Parties | ROBERT REISS, Appellant,<BR>v.<BR>CLARA REISS et al., Respondents. |
Plaintiff's appendix does not contain all of the relevant and necessary portions of the record, thus rendering a determination of the appeal on the merits impracticable. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed (see, CPLR 5528 [a] [5]; Matter of Essenberg v MacKay, 272 AD2d 543; Patel v Patel, 270 AD2d 241, appeal dismissed 95 NY2d 899). In any event, based on the materials submitted, there is no basis upon which to disturb the order.
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
Gaiter v. City of Buffalo Bd. of Educ.
...N.Y.S.2d 52, lv. denied 12 N.Y.3d 711, 2009 WL 1543926 ; Desmarat v. Basile, 288 A.D.2d 336, 337, 734 N.Y.S.2d 461 ; Reiss v. Reiss, 280 A.D.2d 315, 315, 719 N.Y.S.2d 861 ). In any event, defendants' contention is not preserved for our review (see Homan v. Herzig [Appeal No. 2], 55 A.D.3d 1......
-
Gaiter v. City of Buffalo Bd. of Educ. & Martin Luther King Sch.
...N.Y.S.2d 52, lv. denied 12 N.Y.3d 711, 2009 WL 1543926; Desmarat v. Basile, 288 A.D.2d 336, 337, 734 N.Y.S.2d 461; Reiss v. Reiss, 280 A.D.2d 315, 315, 719 N.Y.S.2d 861). In any event, defendants' contention is not preserved for our review ( see Homan v. Herzig [Appeal No. 2], 55 A.D.3d 141......
-
Desmarat v. Basile, 01-01868
...Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed (see, Lowry v. Suffolk Co., Water Auth., supra; Riverso v. Allstate Ins. Co. supra; Reiss v. Reiss, 280 A.D.2d 315; Singh v. Getty Petroleum Corp., supra; Svoboda v. Svoboda, 275 A.D.2d 742; Matter of Gaffney v. Goldrick, 250 A.D.2d 849; Cross Westc......
- MATTER OF SCOTTO v. Giuliani