Relators v. Murphy, 4.
Decision Date | 12 September 1947 |
Docket Number | No. 4.,4. |
Citation | 54 A.2d 719,136 N.J.L. 193 |
Parties | AMERICAN AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL COMPANY, Relators-Respondents, v. Vincent J. MURPHY, John A. Brady, Meyer C. Ellenstein, John B. Keenan, Ralph A. Villani, and City of Newark, a Municipal Corporation, Respondents-Appellants. |
Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from Supreme Court.
Hannoch & Lasser, of Newark (Herbert J. Hannoch and Morris Weinstein, both of Newark, of counsel), for relators-respondents.
Thomas L. Parsonnet, of Newark (Joseph A. Ward, of Newark, for counsel), for respondents-appellants.
This case is controlled by our decision today in the case of Brown et al. Relators-Respondents, v. Murphy et al., Respondents-Appellants, 134 N.J.L. 318, 47 A.2d 595.
The only distinction is that the City, in this case, pursuant to statutory authority (R.S. 40:179-34, N.J.S.A.), established and constructed a seaport and industrial terminal and the lands of the respondents were incorporated therein, and that the City was given the power to condemn by R.S. 40:179-34, N.J.S.A.
The judgment under appeal is affirmed.
For affirmance: The CHANCELLOR, Justices BODINE, DONGES, COLIE, WACHENFELD, EASTWOOD, and BURLING, and Judges WELLS, DILL, FREUND, McGEEHAN, and McLEAN-12.
For reversal: None.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
City of Newark v. Essex County Bd. of Taxation
...complex in the Port Newark area. See Shea v. Ellenstein, 118 N.J.L. 438, 193 A. 551 (Sup.Ct.1937); American Agricultural Chemical Co. v. Murphy, 136 N.J.L. 193, 54 A.2d 719 (E. & A.1947). The terminal covered approximately 700 acres of land and included wharves, warehouses and other buildin......
-
Samuel v. Bor. Of South Plainfield
... ... R.S. 40:2-6, 40:2-7, 40:49-2, N.J.S.A. As explained in Murphy v. West New York, 132 N.J.L. 595, 597, 42 A.2d 5, 7:These (R.S. 40:2-29 and 40:50-6, N.J.S.A.) are peremptory legislative mandates designed to ... ...