Reliable Incubator & Brooder Co. v. Stahl

Decision Date02 January 1901
Docket Number626.
Citation105 F. 663
PartiesRELIABLE INCUBATOR & BROODER CO. v. STAHL.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit

This action was brought by George H. Stahl against the Reliable Incubator & Brooder Company. A motion made by the defendant in error to strike from the record the bill of exceptions has been sustained (42 C.C.A. 522, 102 F. 590), but it is still insisted by the plaintiff in error that upon the fact of the declaration the court below was without jurisdiction of the cause.

The second amended declaration, on which the trial was had purporting to be for trespass on the case, shows that both parties were citizens of Illinois when the suit was commenced; that on November 1, 1892, the plaintiff was a resident of the city of Quincy, and was engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling, and was the owner of letters patent of the United States pertaining to, incubators and incubating and brooding devices and appliances; that at the same time and place the defendant was engaged in a similar business in competition with the plaintiff, and being so engaged they entered into a contract, a copy of which is set out; that afterwards, on October 1, 1893, differences and disputes having arisen between them, they entered into a new contract in lieu of the first, a copy of which is set out and of which the provisions bearing upon the present question are as follows: 'Now, therefore, this agreement made and entered into this 21st day of October, A.D. 1893, by and between George H. Stahl, of the first part, and John W Myers, William B. Dean, Clarence A. Myers, and the Reliable Incubator and Brooder Company, a corporation, parties of the second part, witnesseth: That the said party of the first part is the owner of certain letters patent upon incubators bearing dates and numbers as follows, to wit (a list of 38 patents), * * * (and,) in consideration of the premises herein set forth, contracts to license and permit, and hereby does license and permit, the parties of the second part to make, use, and sell, anywhere in the United States incubators of the same pattern and style as are not made and sold by them under the name and style of Reliable Incubator and Brooder Company and similar to the sample furnished by the said party of the first part, and to give to them the full protection of all of his said letters patent, against all parties whatsoever, in the manufacture, use, and sale of the said incubator in its present style and pattern; but this license is not to be construed as authority to said party of the second part to make or sell any other incubator, or to modify the said incubator so as to incorporate any additional features or improvements in incubators which may be covered by any of the letters patent of the said party of the first part, and the said party of the first part expressly reserves to himself all right to make, use, and sell all incubators and improvements covered by his said letters patent, and to grant license to and contract with all other parties concerning the same. And the said parties of the second part, for and in consideration of the permission and license set forth, and the further consideration of the protection of the aforesaid letters patent of the party of the first part, hereby promise and agree and contract to pay to the said party of the first part the sum of 75c. for each and every incubator of capacity not to exceed 55 eggs, and known as No. 0, and one dollar for each and every other incubator made and sold, leased, or rented by them or their agents after the 21st day of October, 1893. * * * It is further expressly agreed that the said parties of the second part shall make on the first day of each month a sworn statement to the said party of the first part of the number of incubators made, used, and sold by them and their agents for and during the preceding month, and thereupon to pay to the party of the first part the amount found due him according to the terms of this contract at the rate of $1 for each incubator, except the 55-egg capacity incubator, and 75c. for each incubator of that size and number, and, (for) the failure to make such report and pay over all sums found due according to the terms of this contract, said party of the first part may, at his option, terminate this contract upon giving said party of the second part twenty days' notice in writing of his election so to do. * * * It is agreed that this contract shall continue in force for the term of ten years from the 1st day of November, A.D. 1892, but the parties of the second part shall not assign their interest herein, except upon the written consent of the said party of the first part. In witness whereof,' etc.

Compliance with the contract by the defendant until February 1, 1896, is next alleged, and then the declaration proceeds: 'And the plaintiff avers that thereby and by reason of the premises the defendant then and there became, and was and still is the licensee of the plaintiff under the patents mentioned in said contract of license last aforesaid; and it became and was then and there the duty of the said defendant not to make its said incubators in any style or pattern different in any respect from the said style and pattern in which it was licensed to make the same by the terms, conditions, and limitation of the said last-mentioned contract of license in writing, and not to modify the said incubators so as to embrace or include therein any device or contrivance covered by or embraced in the said contract of license secondly hereinabove set forth, and to make truthful and complete monthly reports of the number and sizes of its said incubators made and sold by it, and to pay the license fees thereon according to the tenor and effect of the said last-mentioned contract of license, and to maintain and not to impeach or deny with and against the public the validity of the said letters patent in the said contract of license set forth, and not to deny or in any manner impeach the novelty and utility of the devices embraced in or covered by its said license, or the title of the plaintiff in and to the letters patent set forth in the said secondly above set forth contract of license. Yet the defendant wholly disregarded its said duties and obligations to the plaintiff, at and within the United States, to wit, the city of Quincy, in the county of Adams and state of Illinois, aforesaid, and during the term of duration of the said contract of license secondly hereinabove set forth, and while said last-mentioned contract of license was in full force and effect and binding upon all the parties thereto, and contrary to the terms and conditions thereof, and against the statutes of the United States in relation to letters patent of the United States, and wrongfully and fraudulently intending and designing to injure and more effectually to compete with the plaintiff in his said business, and to deprive him of the just benefit and advantage of his said letters patent, and to deprive him of the large profit he would otherwise have made in the manufacture of and sale of incubators and kindred devices, and to defraud him of the license fees justly due him under and by reason of the said last-mentioned contract of license prior to the commencement of this suit, to wit, between the 21st day of October, 1893, and the sixteenth day of April, 1896, made 4,500 of its said incubators in styles and patterns different from the style and pattern in which it was and had been making the same at the time of and prior to the making of the said contract of license hereinabove secondly set forth, and different from the sample mentioned in said contract of license, and put upon sale and sold and disposed of the same in the markets of the United States, and modified and changed the style and pattern of its said incubators by omitting therefrom the water tank, which was a feature of and in the style and pattern of incubator the defendant was licensed to make as aforesaid, and at the time and place aforesaid made 2,000 other incubators in such said changed style and pattern, and sold and disposed of the same in the markets of the United States, and changed and modified the said style and pattern in which it was licensed as aforesaid to make the said incubators by omitting therefrom certain openings with thumb-plate covers for the purpose of ventilating, and substituting therefor additional openings in the bottom of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • January 9, 1933
    ...Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit provides: 'The court may notice a plain error not assigned.' See Reliable Incubator & Brooder Co. v. Stahl (C.C.A.) 105 F. 663, 668. A similar rule obtains in this Court; and in each of the other Circuit Courts of Appeals except the Eighth. For examp......
  • Hold Stitch Fabric Mach. Co. v. May Hosiery Mills
    • United States
    • Tennessee Supreme Court
    • June 1, 1946
    ... ... v ... Wittemann Co., 88 Misc. 266, 151 N.Y.S. 813; ... Reliable Incubator & Brooder Co. v. Stahl, 7 Cir., ... 105 F. 663, 44 C.C.A. 657; ... ...
  • Wirgman v. Persons
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • November 5, 1903
    ...be had does not deprive the Circuit Court of Appeals of jurisdiction, or justify it in declining to exercise it.' In Reliable, etc., Co. v. Stahl, 105 F. 663, 44 C.C.A. 657, a case carried to the Circuit Court of Appeals on bill exceptions, one of which went to the jurisdiction of the court......
  • Adams v. Shirk
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • January 21, 1901
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT