Reliable Transfer Co., Inc. v. United States, 540
Citation | 497 F.2d 1036 |
Decision Date | 23 May 1974 |
Docket Number | Dockets 73-1513,No. 540,803,73-2325.,540 |
Parties | RELIABLE TRANSFER CO., INC., Plaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
Herbert B. Halberg, New York City (Krisel, Beck & Halberg, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee and cross-appellant Reliable Transfer Co., Inc.
Janis G. Schulmeisters, Atty., Admir. & Ship. Section, Dept. of Justice, New York City , for defendant-appellant and cross-appellee United States.
Before LUMBARD, FRIENDLY and TIMBERS, Circuit Judges.
This case arises from a little saga of the sea — this time involving a coastal tanker, the Mary A. Whalen, that got lost in the waters just outside New York harbor on a clear night in December 1968 when the seas were rough, the tide was running strong and a breakwater light maintained by the Coast Guard was out. The tanker ended up stranded on a sand bar off Rockaway Point.
The owner of the tanker, Reliable Transfer Co., Inc., invoking the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the district court under the Suits In Admiralty Act, 46 U.S.C. § 741 et seq. (1970), sued the United States to recover damages sustained by the stranded tanker.
After a bench trial in the Eastern District of New York before Orrin G. Judd, District Judge, the court found that the stranding of the tanker was caused 25% by the negligence of the Coast Guard in its failure properly to maintain the breakwater light and 75% by the negligence of the vessel in making a U-turn in a dangerous channel when its captain knew that the breakwater light was not operating. The court held under controlling law that each party should bear half of the damages.
We hold that the court was not clearly erroneous in finding that the negligence of both parties, in the proportions stated, caused the stranding.
The vessel's claim that it was not at fault borders on the frivolous; under circumstances requiring extreme care in navigation and with adequate navigation instruments available, the captain simply got lost and was considerably further north than he thought when he made a U-turn in a dangerous channel knowing that the breakwater light was not operating.
We also reject the government's claim that its failure properly to maintain the breakwater light was merely a condition rather than a cause of the stranding. Surely it was a but-for cause. The court found, as common sense would dictate, that if the breakwater light had been operating the captain would not have stranded the vessel. Viewing the government's claim as essentially a variation of the last clear chance doctrine — given the captain's knowledge of the dangerous situation, he should have been able to avoid the stranding — we refuse to apply here the doctrine of last clear chance which has been given only limited application in admiralty. See Petition Of Kinsman Transit Co., 338 F.2d 708, 719-21 (2 Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 944 (1965).
We also decline the invitation to seize upon this case as a vehicle to overrule the equal division of property damage rule that has long applied in admiralty cases where both parties are at fault. Weyerhaeuser Steamship Co. v. United States, 372 U.S. 597, 603 (1963); The Max Morris, 137 U.S. 1, 13 (1890); North Star, 106 U.S. 17 (1882). And we particularly see no basis either in...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hogge v. SS YORKMAR
...Marine Corp. v. United States, 451 F.2d 140 (5th Cir. 1971) (dissemination of an inaccurate chart); Reliable Transfer Co., Inc. v. United States, 497 F.2d 1036 (2nd Cir. 1974), aff'd, 421 U.S. 397, 95 S.Ct. 1708, 44 L.Ed.2d 251 (1975) (failure to maintain a light); Afran Transport Co. v. Un......
-
Great Lakes Bus. Trust v. M/T Orange Sun
...part of the risks which the tortfeasor assumes.” Reliable Transfer Co., Inc. v. U.S.A., 1973 A.M.C. 930, 937 (E.D.N.Y.1973), aff'd,497 F.2d 1036 (2d Cir.1974), vacated on other grounds and remanded,421 U.S. 397, 95 S.Ct. 1708, 44 L.Ed.2d 251 (1975). Further, the applicable standard for judg......
-
United States v. Reliable Transfer Co Inc 8212 363
...the parties are equally at fault or when it is not possible fairly to measure the comparative degree of their fault. Pp. 401-411. 2 Cir., 497 F.2d 1036, vacated and John P. Rupp, Asst. to Sol. Gen., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for petitioner, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court.......
-
Great Lakes Bus. Trust And v. M/T Orange Sun
...of the risks which the tortfeasor assumes." Reliable Transfer Co., Inc. v. U.S.A., 1973 A.M.C. 930, 937 (E.D.N.Y. 1973), aff'd, 497 F.2d 1036 (2d Cir. 1974), vacated on other grounds and remanded, 421 U.S. 397 (1975). Further, the applicable standard for judging an injured party's conduct w......