Remington Rand v. National Labor Relations Board
| Decision Date | 23 May 1938 |
| Docket Number | No. 970,970 |
| Citation | 58 S.Ct. 1046,304 U.S. 576,82 L.Ed. 1540 |
| Parties | REMINGTON RAND, Inc., petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. * |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Messrs. George H. Bond, of Syracuse, N. Y., and George H. Cohen, of Hartford, Conn., for petitioner.
For opinion below, see 94 F.2d 862.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
* Rehearing denied 304 .S. 590 , 58 S.Ct. 1054, 82 L.Ed. ——.
To continue reading
Request your trial
113 cases
-
NLRB v. Gotham Shoe Manufacturing Co.
...of what they might be,'" citing N. L. R. B. v. Remington Rand, Inc., 94 F.2d 862, 869 (2 Cir. 1938), cert. denied, 304 U.S. 576, 58 S.Ct. 1046, 82 L.Ed. 1540 (1938)); Jas. H. Matthews & Co. v. N. L. R. B., 354 F. 2d 432 (8 Cir. 1965) ("the Union was prepared to prove its majority status"; "......
-
Waterman Steamship Corporation v. Gay Cottons
... ... Failure to have on board an up-to-date correction card or chart was not ... National ... ...
-
National Labor Rel. Bd. v. Laister-Kauffmann A. Corp.
...Wood Heel Co., 1 Cir., 124 F.2d 470; N. L. R. B. v. Remington Rand, Inc., 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 873, certiorari denied, 304 U.S. 576, 58 S.Ct. 1046, 82 L.Ed. 1540. The Board properly ruled as it 5. Respondent contends that the Board arbitrarily ignored testimony favorable to respondent and a......
- Austin v. United States
Request a trial to view additional results