Renno v. Sigmon

Decision Date30 September 1941
Citation4 So.2d 11,148 Fla. 229
PartiesRENNO v. SIGMON.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; Paul D. Barns, Judge.

Proceeding by I.J.A. Renno against Fay R. Sigmon to impress a lien for attorney's fees on certain funds paid into the registry of the court as property of the defendant.From the decree plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

Van C. Swearingen of Miami, for appellant.

Edward McArthur, of Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In a divorce suit certain funds were paid into the registry of the court as property of the complainant.At the conclusion of the suit complainant and his attorney failed to agree upon the amount of compensation due the attorney.

Attorney filed petition to impress a lien on the funds, supra, for the payment of such fee as should by the Court be adjudicated to be due the attorney from his client.

Decree impressing the lien as prayed was entered.

Much testimony was taken.It is conflicting and not to be reconciled as to the real issue.On final hearing the Chancellor entered his order, which, inter alia, is:

"It appears unto the Court that from the funds in controversy the plaintiff has recovered the sum now in the registry of the court; that from said funds have been paid $500.00 master's fee, that a court reporter's fee for transcribing testimony has been paid in the sum of $322.00 that the claimant has already been paid the sum of $582.00 as an attorney's fee, and his associate counsel has been paid or promised $350.00.

"The case was not by nature a complicated one, even though it did take seventeen months to dispose of it, and even though the costs were more than might reasonably have been expected under normal conditions.

"All things being considered, it appears that the plaintiff has already been partially compensated for the value of his services to his client, and the court failing to find that any expressed agreement was ever made between the attorney or his client in consideration of the premises, it is thereupon "ordered, adjudged and decreed that the petitionerI.J.A. Renno be awarded the additional sum of One Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($150.00), and that the Clerk of this Court pay to I.J.A. Renno the sum of One Hundred and Fifty ($150.00) Dollars to be deducted from any funds now in the registry of the court, for the said Fay R. Sigmon; and the said Clerk shall pay unto the said Fay R. Sigmon the remainder of said...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • Sinclair, Louis, Siegel, Heath, Nussbaum & Zavertnik, P.A. v. Baucom
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • March 17, 1983
    ...Villages, Inc. v. Thompson, 44 So.2d 679 (Fla.1950), In re Warner's Estate, 160 Fla. 460, 35 So.2d 296 (1948), and Renno v. Sigmon, 148 Fla. 229, 4 So.2d 11 (1941), we have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Petitioner represented Ruby Baucom in divorce proce......
  • Circle Finance Co. v. Peacock
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • May 28, 1981
  • Gerlach v. Donnelly
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • November 20, 1957
    ...Bailey, 1915, 69 Fla. 225, 67 So. 877; Halstead v. Florence Citrus Growers' Ass'n, 1932, 104 Fla. 21, 139 So. 132; and Renno v. Sigmon, 1941, 148 Fla. 229, 4 So.2d 11. The latest expression of this Court upon the subject is found in Brass v. Reed, Fla. 1953, 64 So.2d 646, 648, where among o......
  • Balatsos v. Nebraska Ave. Cafe & Liquor Store
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • June 6, 1947
    ... ... fees is always on the claimant. Brett v. First National ... Bank of Marianna, 97 Fla. 284, 120 So. 554; Renno v ... Sigmon, 148 Fla. 229, 4 So.2d 11. The appellants have ... not carried this burden. Under the circumstances disclosed by ... the record the ... ...
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT