Renno v. Sigmon
Decision Date | 30 September 1941 |
Citation | 4 So.2d 11,148 Fla. 229 |
Parties | RENNO v. SIGMON. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; Paul D. Barns, Judge.
Proceeding by I.J.A. Renno against Fay R. Sigmon to impress a lien for attorney's fees on certain funds paid into the registry of the court as property of the defendant.From the decree plaintiff appeals.
Affirmed.
Van C. Swearingen of Miami, for appellant.
Edward McArthur, of Miami, for appellee.
In a divorce suit certain funds were paid into the registry of the court as property of the complainant.At the conclusion of the suit complainant and his attorney failed to agree upon the amount of compensation due the attorney.
Attorney filed petition to impress a lien on the funds, supra, for the payment of such fee as should by the Court be adjudicated to be due the attorney from his client.
Decree impressing the lien as prayed was entered.
Much testimony was taken.It is conflicting and not to be reconciled as to the real issue.On final hearing the Chancellor entered his order, which, inter alia, is:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Sinclair, Louis, Siegel, Heath, Nussbaum & Zavertnik, P.A. v. Baucom
...Villages, Inc. v. Thompson, 44 So.2d 679 (Fla.1950), In re Warner's Estate, 160 Fla. 460, 35 So.2d 296 (1948), and Renno v. Sigmon, 148 Fla. 229, 4 So.2d 11 (1941), we have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Petitioner represented Ruby Baucom in divorce proce......
- Circle Finance Co. v. Peacock
-
Gerlach v. Donnelly
...Bailey, 1915, 69 Fla. 225, 67 So. 877; Halstead v. Florence Citrus Growers' Ass'n, 1932, 104 Fla. 21, 139 So. 132; and Renno v. Sigmon, 1941, 148 Fla. 229, 4 So.2d 11. The latest expression of this Court upon the subject is found in Brass v. Reed, Fla. 1953, 64 So.2d 646, 648, where among o......
-
Balatsos v. Nebraska Ave. Cafe & Liquor Store
... ... fees is always on the claimant. Brett v. First National ... Bank of Marianna, 97 Fla. 284, 120 So. 554; Renno v ... Sigmon, 148 Fla. 229, 4 So.2d 11. The appellants have ... not carried this burden. Under the circumstances disclosed by ... the record the ... ...