Renshaw v. Coldwater Housing Commission

Decision Date03 March 1969
Docket NumberNo. 18,18
Citation381 Mich. 590,165 N.W.2d 5
PartiesOscar RENSHAW and Mary Renshaw, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. COLDWATER HOUSING COMMISSION, a Municipal Corporation, and William Grimes, Building Commissioner of the City of Coldwater, Defendants and Appellees.
CourtMichigan Supreme Court

Daniel Hodgman, Detroit, for plaintiffs and appellants.

Richard F. Biringer, Coldwater, for defendants and appellees.

Clay T. Brockman, Coldwater, for Coldwater Housing Commission.

Before BRENNAN, C.J., and DETHMERS, KELLY, BLACK, THOMAS M. KAVANAGH, ADAMS and THOMAS GILES KAVANAGH, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Two ordinances of the city of Coldwater, conflicting as the parties agree, frame the issue decided below and brought here on appeal. The first, enacted in 1961 on authority of P.A.1921, No. 207 (C.L.1948, § 125.581 et seq; Mich.Stat.Ann. 5.2931 et seq), zoned the area adjacent to and including plaintiffs' residence so as to exclude construction and occupancy as in the second ordinance provided. The second ordinance was enacted in 1965 on authority of P.A.1933, No. 18 extra session, C.L.1948, § 125.651 et seq; Mich.Stat.Ann. 5.3011 et seq. This last cited statute is known generally as the housing and slum clearance act of 1933.

Both the title and certain sections of the act of 1933 have been amended from time to time. We are concerned presently and particularly with sections 2, 3, 7 and 39 thereof. The pertinent portions of those sections are arrayed below.

'Sec. 2. Any city, incorporated village or township of the state of Michigan may purchase, acquire, construct, maintain, operate, improve, extend or repair housing facilities and eliminate housing conditions which are detrimental to the public peace, health, safety, morals or welfare.' C.L.S.1961, § 125.652.

'Sec. 3. Any city, incorporated village or township may create by ordinance, a commission with power to accomplish the purposes set forth in section 2 of this act. * * *.' C.L.S.1961, § 125.653.

'Sec. 7. Such commission shall have the following enumerated powers and duties:

(a) To determine in what areas of the city or village it is necessary to provide proper sanitary housing facilities for families of low income and for the elimination of housing conditions which are detrimental to the public peace, health, safety, morals, and/or welfare; * * *.' C.L.1948, § 125.657.

'Sec. 39. This act shall, without reference to any other statute or to any charter, be deemed full authority for the purposes herein provided for and for the issuance and sale of the bonds by this act authorized, and shall be construed as an additional and alternative method therefor and for the financing thereof, any provisions of the general laws of the state or of any charter to the contrary notwithstanding.' C.L.1948, § 125.689.

Coldwater proceeded under the 1965 ordinance to create such a municipal housing commission. The commission planned and commenced construction of a 4-story, 100-unit federally financed unit, designed to house non-transient persons aged 62 or over, in the aforesaid zoned area. The necessary building permit was issued, the construction contract was let, and construction commenced July 31, 1967.

August 2, 1967 plaintiffs filed complaint in the local circuit, alleging that the proposed unit if constructed would violate the zoning ordinance as that ordinance stood prior to enactment of certain enabling 1967 amendments thereof (which amendments we assume but do not decide were invalid). Injunctive relief was prayed for and denied. Summary judgment, that plaintiffs' complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, was entered. Appeal having been taken to the Court of Appeals, this Court granted bypass under GCR 1963, 852.

On appeal plaintiffs rely upon Taber v. City of Benton Harbor, 280 Mich. 522, 274 N.W. 324. There it was held that Benton Harbor, planning at the time to construct a municipal...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Rollingwood Home Owners Corp. v. City of Flint
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • August 10, 1970
    ...of the city of Flint does not expressly provide that contracts are to be approved by ordinance and cite Renshaw v. Coldwater Housing Commission (1969), 381 Mich. 590, 165 N.W.2d 5. They argue that even if such provision were in the charter it would be inoperative. Renshaw, supra, held that ......
  • Dearden v. City of Detroit
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • August 30, 1978
    ...that required compliance with the ordinances of the city in which the hospital was located. The court in Renshaw v. Coldwater Housing Commission, 381 Mich. 590, 594, 165 N.W.2d 5 (1969), held that a municipality's housing commission was not subject to the municipality's zoning ordinance. In......
  • Dearden v. City of Detroit
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • July 20, 1976
    ...with a statute cannot be given effect. In re Petition of Detroit, 308 Mich. 480, 14 N.W.2d 140 (1944). In Renshaw v. Coldwater Housing Commission, 381 Mich. 590, 165 N.W.2d 5 (1969), the action of a municipal housing authority in providing low income housing was challenged as contrary to th......
  • Alco Universal Inc. v. City of Flint
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • December 21, 1971
    ...Authority of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles, Supra, 7 McQuillin, Municipal Corporations (3rd Ed.), 609; Renshaw v. Coldwater Housing Commission, (1969) 381 Mich. 590, 165 N.W.2d 5. The pertinent parts of Michigan's act 'Sec. 2. Any city, incorporated village or township of the State of Michigan......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT