Reome v. Edwards

• Decision Date: 18 May 1948
• Docket Number: 28343.
• Citation: 79 N.E.2d 389,226 Ind. 229
• Parties: REOME et al. v. EDWARDS et al.
• Court: Indiana Supreme Court

79 N.E.2d 389

226 Ind. 229

REOME et al. v. EDWARDS et al.

No. 28343.

Supreme Court of Indiana

May 18, 1948

Appeal from Noble Circuit Court; Fred L. Bodenhafer, Judge.

Charles C. Fraze, and Martin H. Spangler, both of Albion, for appellants.

Cleon H. Foust, Atty. Gen., and Miller Davis and A. W. Groves Deputy Attys. Gen., for Indiana Department of Conservation amicus curiae.

Howard L. Townsend, Harry H. Hilgemann and John H. Logan, all of Fort Wayne, for appellees.

YOUNG Judge.

This was a proceeding brought by appellants to establish the level of Bear Lake in Noble Township, Noble County, Indiana, and to maintain the same by the construction of a control dam in accordance with Chapter 102 of the Acts of the General Assembly of Indiana of 1935, § 27-607, et seq., Burns' 1945 Pkt. Supp., generally known as the Lake Levels Act. Subsequently appellees joined in a remonstrance in which they alleged that they were the owners of two-thirds in area of the lands named in the petition or which may be affected by an assessment of benefits or damages for the construction of the proposed dam. A motion was filed by appellants to strike out the remonstrance and same was overruled. Thereafter, upon the issues joined upon the petition and the remonstrance, there was a hearing.

The evidence before the court consisted solely of a stipulation of facts and a plat of Noble Township, Noble County, Indiana. By the stipulation it appeared that the total acreage of lands described in the petition is 2118.79 acres; that the owners of 1850.69 acres thereof signed the remonstrance; that in addition to the owners of land named in the petition the owners of 1579.40 acres not named in the petition also signed the remonstrance, and that surface waters from the land of all the remonstrators naturally flow into drains which eventually discharge their waters into Bear Lake and thence into the Elkhart River by way of ditches.

The court found that the remonstrators constituted the owners of more than two-thirds in area of the lands named in the petition and of lands which would be affected by an assessment of benefits or damages. Upon this finding the court sustained the remonstrance and rendered judgment dismissing the petition at petitioners' cost and from this judgment this appeal has been taken.

The remonstrance was filed pursuant to § 8, ch. 264 of the Acts of the Indiana General Assembly of 1933, same being generally known as the Indiana Drainage Act, § 27-108, Burns' 1933, and it is conceded by the appellants that the only question for the decision of this court in this case is whether or not § 8 of the Drainage Act applies to a proceeding to establish the level of a fresh water lake instituted under the Lake Levels Act of 1935. The Lake Levels Act of 1935 provides that when 20 per cent or more of the owners of land abutting upon or being within 440 yards of the high water mark of any lake containing 10 or more acres, shall desire to establish and maintain the level of such lake by means of a dam or other structure, they shall file a petition with the clerk of the circuit court in the county in which the lands of the petitioners are situated.

One statute may adopt another statute, in whole or in part, by reference thereto and when this is done the effect is the same as though the adopted statute, or part thereof, were written into the adopting statute. State ex rel. v. Board of Commissioners of Marion County, 1909, 170 Ind. 595, 619, 85 N.E. 513; State ex rel. v. Leich, 1906, 166 Ind. 680, 682, 78 N.E. 189, 9 Ann.Cas. 302. That is what was done by Lake Levels Act, § 2 of which reads as follows:

'Sec. 2. When any such petition is filed, the court shall have the same power, and any and all officers and persons who may be concerned in any manner whatsoever, in the construction, reconstruction, alteration and rehabilitation of such dams or other structures affecting the raising and/or establishing and maintaining the level of any lake, shall proceed in all respects in the same manner prescribed in and subject to each and every provision of chapter 264 of the Acts of the General Assembly of 1933.' Acts of 1935, ch. 102, § 27-608, Burns' 1945 Pkt. Supp.

Section 8 of the Drainage Act, Acts of 1933, ch. 264, and § 27-108, Burns' 1933, reads as follows:

'Sec 8. If, within twenty (20) days, exclusive of Sundays, from the day set for the docketing of such petition, the owners of two-thirds in area of the acreage of the lands named as such in the petition, or who may be affected by an assessment of benefits or damages, shall remonstrate in writing against the construction of such drain or ditch, such petition shall be...