Reports of Grand Jury No. 1 of Monroe County Empaneled on Jan. 30, 1978 for the Feb., 1978 Term of County Court, Matter of
| Decision Date | 30 January 1978 |
| Citation | Reports of Grand Jury No. 1 of Monroe County Empaneled on Jan. 30, 1978 for the Feb., 1978 Term of County Court, Matter of, 420 N.Y.S.2d 946, 71 A.D.2d 1060 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978) |
| Parties | In the Matter of the REPORTS OF GRAND JURY NO. 1 OF THE COUNTY OF MONROE EMPANELED ON |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Lawrence T. Kurlander, Dist. Atty., Rochester by Melvin Bressler, Rochester, for appellant.
Theodore N. Pucher, Rochester, for Subject C.
John M. Owens, Rochester, for Subject A.
Christopher J. Enos, Rochester, for Subject D.
Before SIMONS, J. P., and HANCOCK, CALLAHAN, DOERR, and MOULE, JJ.
This is an appeal pursuant to CPL 190.90 from an Order of the Monroe County Court, entered August 31, 1979, which accepted and sealed two reports of the February, 1978Monroe County Grand Jury.The February, 1978Monroe County Grand Jury investigated, inter alia, allegations concerning improprieties in the issuance of licenses to carry firearms as well as allegations of misconduct in the Monroe County Sheriff's Department.The Grand Jury heard testimony in the two matters, captioned "John DoeNo. 3"and"John DoeNo. 7" and after concluding its investigation issued two separate reports pursuant to CPL 190.85, subd. 1, par. (a) in which it recommended that disciplinary action be taken against six named individuals.Pursuant to CPL 190.85, subd. 2, par. (a), the Monroe County Court examined the minutes of the Grand Jury and determined that both reports should remain sealed and not be published as a public record since the Grand Jury's findings of wrongdoing were not supported by a preponderance of the credible and legally admissible evidence.
The record of the Grand Jury in "John DoeNo. 7" discloses evidence of serious misconduct in the Monroe County Sheriff's Department.Nevertheless, the statute permits publication only of Grand Jury reports which recommend disciplinary action against public servants guilty of misconduct, non-feasance or neglect in public office and which reports are supported by the preponderance of the "credible and legally admissible evidence."(CPL 190.85, subd. 2, par. (a);Matter of Talerico, 34 A.D.2d 553, 309 N.Y.S.2d 511.)Our review of the Grand Jury minutes concerning "John DoeNo. 7" compels the conclusion that some of the abuses alleged relate to former public servants and some involve errors in judgment.Inasmuch as the charges either do not pertain to persons presently employed by the department or are not supported by the evidence required by statute,...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Onondaga County District Attorney's Office to File a Sealed Grand Jury Report as a Public Record, Matter of
...County Grand Jury for March 1979 Term [R-A], 77 A.D.2d 399, 404, 434 N.Y.S.2d 768; see, also, Matter of Reports of Grand Jury No. 1 of County of Monroe, 71 A.D.2d 1060, 420 N.Y.S.2d 946). It was not until the People's time to appeal had expired that respondent entered into the retainer agre......
-
Report of 1985-1986 Special Grand Jury, Nassau County, N.Y., Term IX, Matter of
...against these individuals, their names should also be stricken from the report and answer (cf., Matter of Reports of Grand Jury No. 1 of County of Monroe, 71 A.D.2d 1060, 420 N.Y.S.2d 946). ...
-
Special Rensselaer County Grand Jury Reports for 1983 Term I, Matter of
...criticizes a public servant for errors in judgment respecting the transmittal of documents (see Matter of Reports of Grand Jury No. 1 of County of Monroe, 71 A.D.2d 1060, 420 N.Y.S.2d 946; Matter of South Mall Financing, 69 Misc.2d 460, 463, 330 N.Y.S.2d 170), and with regard to the events ......
-
Report of April, 1979 Grand Jury of Montgomery County, Matter of
...Grand Jury Reports for the March 1979 Term, App.Div., 434 N.Y.S.2d 768 (Dec. 11, 1980); see also Matter of Reports of Grand Jury No. 1 of County of Monroe, 71 A.D.2d 1060, 420 N.Y.S.2d 946). The Grand Jury's contention overlooks or disregards paragraph (a) of subdivision 1 of CPL 190.85 whi......