Reproductive Services, Inc v. Walker 719

Decision Date22 January 1979
Docket NumberNo. 78-,78-
Citation439 U.S. 1133,99 S.Ct. 1057,59 L.Ed.2d 96
PartiesREPRODUCTIVE SERVICES, INC. v. Dee Brown WALKER, District Judge, etc 719
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Texas.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied for want of jurisdiction.

Mr. Justice STEVENS.

On On July 10, 1978, Mr. Justice BRENNAN stayed the order of the Texas Supreme Court. On July 17, 1978, Mr. Justice BRENNAN vacated that stay and filed an opinion, 439 U.S. 1307, 99 S.Ct. 1, 58 L.Ed.2d 16, stating in part:

"The question sought to be raised by applicant—whether the names of abortion patients can be obtained by discovery for use in a civil suit against a person or clinic performing abortions where, as here, the parties have not agreed to a protective order to ensure the privacy of those patients—is a serious one. If this question were in fact presented by this case, I am of the view that four Members of this Court would vote to grant certiorari to hear it. However, this issue is not presented here. First, the order of the trial court challenged by applicant's petition for mandamus did in fact provide that the names of applicant's patients could be deleted. Second, the State of Texas has represented in its response in this Court that it is prepared to enter into a protective order which will ensure the privacy of all patients at applicant's clinics. In light of the representations of the State of Texas, there is no irreparable injury to any patient's privacy interests which would justify a stay of the order of the Supreme Court of Texas.

"Therefore, on express condition that the parties agree to a protective order ensuring the privacy of patients at applicant's clinics, the stay I entered on July 10, 1978, in these proceedings is hereby dissolved. If such a protective order is not entered, applicant may resubmit a further stay application." 439 U.S., at 1309, 99 S.Ct., at 2 (footnote omitted).

On August 21, 1978, Mr. Justice BRENNAN re-entered his stay because the parties had not satisfied the express condition identified in his opinion of July 17, 1978. 439 U.S. 1354, 99 S.Ct. 1, 2, 58 L.Ed.2d 61.

On Justice POWELL granted an extension of time, until October 30, 1978, in which to file a petition for writ of certiorari. The petition for a writ of certiorari was timely filed on October 30, 1978.

Since the rationale for the Court's jurisdictional holding is unclear, and since adequate reasons for...

To continue reading

Request your trial
82 cases
  • McGee v. Estelle
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 16 d1 Janeiro d1 1984
    ...the Eighth Circuit also is ambiguous. Compare Collins v. Auger, 577 F.2d 1107, 1109 n. 1 (8th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1133, 99 S.Ct. 1057, 59 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979) (exhaustion waivable when interests of justice and expedition so require) with Davis v. Campbell, 608 F.2d 317, 320 n. 10......
  • U.S. v. Byers
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • 24 d2 Julho d2 1984
    ... ... 559, 24 L.Ed.2d 497 (1970); United States v. Albright, 388 F.2d 719 (4th Cir.1968); Alexander v. United States, 380 F.2d 33 (8th Cir.1967); ... an institution resulted in substandard or incompetent evaluative services or that some deficiency in the hospital should call the unanimous ... ...
  • Woodard v. Sargent
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Arkansas
    • 5 d5 Agosto d5 1983
    ...the meaning of Wainwright. The petitioner relies on Collins v. Auger, 577 F.2d 1107 (8th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1133, 99 S.Ct. 1057, 59 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979). There the court adopted the district court's conclusion that "lack of knowledge of the facts or law would be sufficient cause......
  • U.S. v. Wuagneux
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • 23 d1 Agosto d1 1982
    ... ... Corporation to two sham corporations set up by Gopman: Fortune Services, Inc., and Ace Services, Inc. Thus, category 1 of the warrant is properly ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT