Republic Oil Refining Co. v. Granger

Decision Date21 June 1951
Docket NumberCivil Action No. 8669.
Citation98 F. Supp. 921
PartiesREPUBLIC OIL REFINING CO. v. GRANGER, Collector of Internal Revenue.
CourtU.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania

C. W. Campbell, and J. Vincent Burke, Jr., of Campbell, Houck & Thomas, Pittsburgh, Pa., and Edgar J. Goodrich, and Jerome J. Dick, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Courtney C. Hamilton, Washington, D. C., and Edward C. Boyle, U. S. Atty., Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant.

GOURLEY, Chief Judge.

This is an action by the Republic Oil Refining Company, a Texas Corporation, against Stanley Granger, Collector of Internal Revenue for the Western District of Pennsylvania, to recover for excise taxes assessed and collected under the provisions of Section 3460 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1941, c. 412, 55 Stat. 687, Secs. 502 and 521 (a) (22), and by the Revenue Act of 1942, c. 619, 56 Stat. Sec. 616, 26 U.S.C.A. § 3460 (a) and (b).

The Internal Revenue Code, as it applies to the instant case, provides:

"Transportation Of Oil By Pipe Line

"(a) Computation and payment. There shall be imposed upon all transportation of crude petroleum and liquid products thereof by pipe line—

"(1) A tax equivalent to 4 ½ per centum of the amount paid for such transportation, to be paid by the person furnishing such transportation.

"(2) In case no charge for transportation is made, either by reason of ownership of the commodity transported or for any other reason, a tax equivalent to 4 ½ per centum of the fair charge for such transportation, to be paid by the person furnishing such transportation.

"(3) If (other than in the case of an arm's length transaction) the payment for transportation is less than the fair charge therefor, a tax equivalent to 4 ½ per centum of such fair charge, to be paid by the person furnishing such transportation.

"(b) Fair charge defined. For the purposes of this section, the fair charge for transportation shall be computed —

"(1) from actual bona fide rates or tariffs, or

"(2) if no such rates or tariffs exist, then on the basis of the actual bona fide rates or tariffs of other pipe lines for like services, as determined by the Commissioner, or

"(3) if no such rates or tariffs exist, then on the basis of a reasonable charge for such transportation, as determined by the Commissioner. 53 Stat. 421, as amended June 29, 1939, 10 p. m. E.S.T., c. 247, Title I, § 1, 53 Stat. 862."

Exemption provisions were added to the Internal Revenue Code: "Exempt transportation. For the purposes of this section, the term `transportation' shall not include any movement through lines of pipe within the premises of a refinery, a bulk plant, a terminal, or a gasoline plant, if such movement is not a continuation of a taxable transportation. The crossing of rights-of-way, streets, highways, railroads, levees, or narrow bodies of water, in connection with such a movement, shall not of itself constitute such movement as being `transportation'." 26 U.S.C.A. § 3460(c).

The old regulations issued in conjunction with Sec. 731 of the Internal Revenue Act were substantially modified and now appear as Treasury Regulations 42, Secs. 130.20 through 130.26, promulgated under the Internal Revenue Code:

"Sec. 130.20. Effective Period. The tax on the transportation of crude petroleum and liquid products thereof by pipe line was imposed originally by Title V of the Revenue Act of 1932. The applicable provisions of the Revenue Act of 1932 were superseded, effective March 1, 1939, by provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. The rate of tax was increased from 4 per cent to 4 ½ per cent by section 1650(a), as added by section 210 of the Revenue Act of 1940, effective for a period of five years beginning July 1, 1940. The tax at such increased rate was made permanent by amendment of section 3460(a) by section 502 of the Revenue Act of 1941.

"Sec. 130.21. Scope of Tax. Section 3460, as amended by section 502 of the Revenue Act of 1941, imposes a tax on all transportation of crude petroleum and liquid products thereof by pipe line.

"The tax applies to any movement of the specified products by pipe line by any person regardless of whether the movement is for hire. The ownership of the pipe-line facilities, or of the product transported, is immaterial. The taxable pipeline movement of the specified products includes gathering service within the producing field or area, trunk line transportation service, and loading service furnished as part of, or in connection with, a transportation service.

"Sec. 130.22 Gathering, Trunk line, and Loading services.

* * * * * *

"Trunk line service includes movements of the specified products from the end of gathering lines, or from unloading points such as loading racks or loading wharves, through main or trunk pipe lines to a point of delivery.

"Loading service includes the loading of the specified products into tank cars or tank vessels over loading racks or loading wharves, where such service is performed as part of, or in connection with, transportation service.

"Sec. 130.23. Liability for Tax. The tax is payable by the person furnishing the transportation service.

"Sec. 130.24. Rate and Computation of Tax. The tax is imposed at the rate of 4-½ per cent of the amount paid under actual bona fide rates or tariffs for transportation of crude petroleum and liquid products thereof by pipe line.

"Where no charge is made for the transportation of crude petroleum and liquid products thereof by pipe line by reason of the ownership of the commodity so transported, or for any other reason, the tax, at the rate of 4-½ per cent, shall be computed on the basis of a fair charge for such transportation, as determined by the Commissioner.

"In cases of other than arm's-length transactions, where the payment for transportation of crude petroleum and liquid products thereof by pipe line is less than the fair charge for such transportation, the tax at the rate of 4-½ per cent shall be computed on the basis of a fair charge for such transportation, as determined by the Commissioner.

"Sec. 130.25. Fair Charge. Where no actual bona fide rates or tariffs have been published to cover any particular pipe-line transportation movement of crude petroleum or liquid products thereof, the Commissioner will determine what constitutes a fair charge for the purpose of this tax in respect of the particular movement under consideration, on the basis of the ordinary or customary charge for like or similar service.

"Where no ordinary or customary charge for like or similar service exists there should be submitted to the Commissioner for his guidance and assistance in determining a fair charge, (a) a full statement of the facts surrounding the particular movement; (b) a full description of the pipe-line system; and (c) a map or diagram showing in detail the particular area or field and the pipe-line facilities used, including tanks at the point of origin, along the line and at destination, loading and unloading facilities, and any other facilities used in connection with such system.

"Sec. 130.26. as added by T.D. 5190, 1942-2 Cum. Bull. 237. Exempt Transportation. The tax does not apply to the movement on and after November 1, 1942, of crude petroleum or liquid products thereof through lines of pipe within the premises of a refinery, a bulk plant, a terminal, or a gasoline plant, if such movement is not a continuation of a taxable transportation. For purposes of this exemption, a movement is regarded as being carried on within the premises of a refinery, bulk plant, terminal, or gasoline plant even though in connection with such a movement the pipe line through which the petroleum or liquid products thereof are carried incidentally traverse rights-of-way, streets, highways, railroads, levees or narrow bodies of water (such as creeks, canals, etc.)."

Although the parties do not agree upon the nature of the particular movements involved, and on which the tax is based, the basic facts are not in dispute.

Republic's claim is to recover $24,778.03 paid to the defendant as assessed excise taxes on the transportation of oil by pipe line for the period May 1, 1942, through January 31, 1946, in connection with movements of crude petroleum and liquid products thereof propelled by taxpayer's pumps to and from vessels at wharves or docks and taxpayer's refinery premises at Texas City, Texas.

During the taxable periods involved, prior thereto and since, Republic was and is a Texas Corporation, doing business in that state, particularly at Texas City, Texas, but with principal offices at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

As a part of its business it owned and operated a refinery and two adjacent tank farms some distance from docks and wharves owned and operated by Texas City Terminal Railway Company.

The Taxpayer's business at Texas City including dealing in and processing crude petroleum and liquid products thereof. Such products moved by pipe line to and from vessels at the docks on Galveston Bay at Texas City, to and from pumps situated on taxpayer's two tank farms near its refinery proper. The tanks on the two tank farms were used for storage and also in the processing and refining of oil. All the movements here involved were propelled by taxpayer's pumps which moved the products from vessels into taxpayer's tank farm tanks and, in reverse movements, forced products from taxpayer's tank farm tanks into the vessels.

The taxpayer's pumps were four in number and were situated at points varying from approximately 2500 feet to 4000 feet from the docks. The taxpayer's pipe lines also transversed the two loading and receiving docks used, distances of 500 feet on one and 900 feet on the other. Though the pipe lines across the docks were operated by the taxpayer, nevertheless the Texas City Terminal Railway Company charged the taxpayer for loading and unloading there in accordance with and pursuant to its published tariff.

Other movements occurred within the boundaries of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Citizens Casualty Co. of NY v. LC Jones Trucking Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • 16 Noviembre 1956
    ...5 S. Ct. 826, 29 L.Ed. 158; Cunard S. S. Co. v. Mellon, 262 U.S. 100, 121, 122, 43 S. Ct. 504, 67 L.Ed. 894; Republic Oil Refining Co. v. Granger, D.C.Pa., 98 F. Supp. 921, 933; United States v. Kambeitz, D.C.N.Y., 256 F. 247, 250; Dixie Oil Co. v. United States, 5 Cir., 24 F.2d 804, 805; Q......
  • Republic Oil Refining Co. v. Granger
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • 27 Junio 1952
    ...of oil over these easements appurtenant are within the premises of the refinery and exempt from taxation."1 (Emphasis supplied). 98 F.Supp. 921, 940-941. The majority opinion holds that whether the easement controlled lands through which the pipe lines ran were part of the refinery premises......
  • United States v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • 27 Junio 1951
  • Pan American Refining Corp. v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas
    • 8 Diciembre 1953
    ...section, and hence exempt from tax. The facts of this case are strikingly similar to those presented by Republic Oil Refining Co. v. Granger, D.C., 98 F. Supp. 921, affirmed 3 Cir., 198 F.2d 161, wherein the taxpayer there, being the plaintiff's immediately adjacent neighbor, contested the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT