Resnick v. East Brunswick Township Board of Education

• Decision Date: 16 November 1976
• Citation: 366 A.2d 345,144 N.J.Super. 474
• Parties: Abraham RESNICK, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. EAST BRUNSWICK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant-Appellant, Reform Temple of East Brunswick et al., Defendants. Abraham RESNICK, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. REFORM TEMPLE OF EAST BRUNSWICK, Defendant-Appellant, East Brunswick Township Board of Education, Defendants.
• Court: New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division

Page 474

144 N.J.Super. 474

366 A.2d 345

Abraham RESNICK, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. EAST BRUNSWICK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant-Appellant, Reform Temple of East Brunswick et al., Defendants.

Abraham RESNICK, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. REFORM TEMPLE OF EAST BRUNSWICK, Defendant-Appellant, East Brunswick Township Board of Education, Defendants.

Superior Court of New Jersey,

Appellate Division.

Argued Nov. 1, 1976.

Decided Nov. 16, 1976.

On appeal from Superior Court, Chancery Division, whose opinion is reported at 135 N.J.Super. 257, 343 A.2d 127.

Frank J. Rubin, New Brunswick, for East Brunswick Bd. of Ed. (Rubin & Lerner, New Brunswick, attorneys).

Samuel H. Davis, Edison, for Reform Temple of East Brunswick (Dubowsky & Davis, Edison, attorneys).

Seymour Gelzer, East Brunswick, filed a brief and was permitted to argue the cause for East Brunswick Baptist Church, even though no notice of appeal was filed (Iaria & Gelzer, East Brunswick, attorneys).

Sanford Rader, Perth Amboy, for plaintiff-respondent (Kovacs, Anderson, Horowitz & Rader, Perth Amboy, attorneys).

Before Judges BISCHOFF, MORGAN and COLLESTER.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the trial court, reported at 135 N.J.Super. 257, 343 A.2d 127.