Revell v. Com., 740689
| Decision Date | 28 April 1975 |
| Docket Number | No. 740689,740689 |
| Citation | 213 S.E.2d 756,215 Va. 708 |
| Court | Virginia Supreme Court |
| Parties | James E. REVELL v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia. Record |
Charles W. Hawks, Jr., Portsmouth, for plaintiff in error.
Alan Katz, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Andrew P. Miller, Atty. Gen., on brief), for defendant in error.
Before I'ANSON, C.J., and CARRICO, HARRISON, COCHRAN, HARMAN, POFF and COMPTON, JJ.
Waiving trial by jury, James E. Revell (defendant) was tried and convicted of embezzlement of a 1968 BSA motorcycle. He was sentenced to twelve months in jail, with the sentence suspended on condition that he make restitution.
The crucial issue here is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction.
The record reveals that Franklin A. Coveney (Coveney) visited BSA of Portsmouth, Inc. (BSA), to obtain a new chain for his motorcycle. While there, Coveney talked with Revell, an employee of BSA, concerning the possible sale of Coveney's motorcycle. Revell agreed that he would attempt to sell the motorcycle for $800.00 or more. If it was sold for an amount greater than $800.00, BSA was to retain the excess.
Later, Coveney delivered the motorcycle to the defendant at BSA. Upon returning to BSA approximately two weeks later, Coveney was advised that the vehicle had been sold for $780.00. He was also told that he must make a blank assignment of his title to the motorcycle and leave it with BSA so that the buyer of the motorcycle could obtain financing. Coveney could not remember who requested the blank assignment of title nor could he remember whether the title certificate was signed in the presence of defendant or some other BSA employee. Coveney returned to BSA on three subsequent occasions but was unable to obtain his money or to see defendant.
The only evidence regarding defendant's position with BSA was Coveney's testimony that Revell '. . . appeared to be the boss; everything seemed to float around him.'
Frank Robertson, Jr. (Robertson), who purchased the motorcycle in question from BSA, testified that he dealt with someone other than Revell when transacting his purchase. The sales contract between Robertson and BSA showed the saleman's name to be 'McBride.'
The only evidence regarding the proceeds of the sale consisted of Robertson's testimony that '. . . Beneficial (Finance) gave me a check in my name, I came back and I signed the check all, you know, to them (BSA).'
To constitute the statutory crime of embezzlement it is necessary to prove...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Bourgeois v. Com., 751161
...855, 859, 49 S.E. 638, 640 (1905). See Carolene Products Co. v. United States, 140 F.2d 61, 65 (4th Cir. 1944). In Revell v. Commonwealth, 215 Va. 708, 213 S.E.2d 756 (1975), an embezzlement case, we considered the status of the accused who, one witness testified, 'appeared to be the boss' ......
-
Alger v. Com.
...were adopted, courts were ordering restitution. See Payne v. Commonwealth, 222 Va. 485, 281 S.E.2d 873 (1981); Revell v. Commonwealth, 215 Va. 708, 213 S.E.2d 756 (1975). To follow Alger's argument, we would have to hold that the legislature intended to curtail the class of victims to whom ......
-
Evans v. Com., 821755
...of embezzlement. Code § 18.2-111. C.D. Smith v. Commonwealth, 222 Va. 646, 649, 283 S.E.2d 209, 210 (1981); cf. Revell v. Commonwealth, 215 Va. 708, 213 S.E.2d 756 (1975). And Black's Law Dictionary 300 (5th ed. 1979), to which counsel referred us, gives this definition of the noun form of ......
-
Smith v. Com., 801893
...made more than five days prior to such date.2 Defendant cites two other cases which are wholly inapposite. In Revell v. Commonwealth, 215 Va. 708, 709, 213 S.E.2d 756, 757 (1975), the record was "devoid of proof that ... [the embezzled property] ever came into Revell's possession"; in Foste......